Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : YEEHAW CANDIDATES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken W who wrote (7653)	5/6/2005 12:37:03 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 23958

[RCO] Ken .. it's wound pretty tight. stockcharts.com[w,a]dacayiay[db][pb50!c8!f][vc60][iut!Ua12,26,9!Uv25]&pref=G Ray

To: Ken W who wrote (7653)	5/6/2005 2:04:50 PM
From: ACAN	Respond to of 23958

Ken; ALAN - interesting that JPTC is involved. I have thought for some time that a real case for RFID would be in the storage of each persons Medical status, either imbedded or on a bracelet configuration. This could be critical in cases of coma, sroke, heart attack etc. The time factor in proper treatment would be a matter of life over death. In so far as defense is concerned, where better than on a battlefield to leave no room for doubt as to the person's current medical status. They are now using it for the control of meds and pharmaceuticals in hospitals, and should be integrating it with the patients status to eliminate errors( anyone who has had any medication supplied in the middle of the night by a lady with a tiny flashlight, suffering from a sleep deficit, knows the fear of the wrong dose and drug delivery). Privacy issues always rear their ugly head, until you are involved intimately with the medical system, and their outdated paper system. Also how about avoiding friendly fire situations? Allan