SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NHP who wrote (28168)5/8/2005 10:24:18 PM
From: Done, gone.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
My concern now is, how important is Image Stabilization?

Not a must have at short lens lengths, but amazingly useful with long ones -- over 100mm, 35mm equivalent. I work with a 70-200 IS Canon lens that makes possible sharp hand held photos in light levels at least four times as dim as without IS.



To: NHP who wrote (28168)5/9/2005 4:22:12 AM
From: limtex  Respond to of 60323
 
NHP - Well I'm still prejudiced...a movie camera has to look like a movie camera. I don't care how good they say it is, it can only be any good provided it looks like a movie camera<g>

Best,

L



To: NHP who wrote (28168)5/19/2005 8:10:21 AM
From: NHP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Good Article in 19 May 05 WSJ on digital file formats.
Page B1
"How TIFF, RAW Help Pricey New Digitals Produce Better Pictures."

I think that we are familiar with most of contents of the article, although RAW(as a format) is new to me.

The article steered me to openraw.org where I found some important information on RAW. Take a look!

NHP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News