SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (29668)5/9/2005 10:11:05 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
UK March manufacturing output falls 3rd month in a row; to weigh on Q1 GDP
Monday, May 9, 2005 8:49:56 AM
afxpress.com

LONDON (AFX ) - Manufacturing output in the UK -- which accounts for just under 20 pct of the economy -- fell for the third month running in March signalling that sector is in decline, official figures showed today

The office of National Statistics revealed that manufacturing output in March fell 1.6 pct from the previous month against expectations of a modest 0.1 pct increase. The latest reading is the weakest since the distorting effects of the Jubilee bank holidays in June 2002. But that aside, the March number is the weakest since January 1995

Compared with a year ago, manufacturing fell 1.1 pct, well under predictions of a 0.8 pct increase

The slump came after a 2.7 monthly drop in the production of chemicals and man-made fibres industries and a 2.2 pct decline in paper printing and publishing. There were no significant rises during the month

In an indication of just how bad things are in the sector, the manufacturing sector fell 0.7 pct in the first quarter compared with the previous quarter for a 0.2 pct year-on-year increase. The annual rate is the weakest since may 2003. The wider measure of industrial production, which also includes such things as oil production and therefore accounts for just over 20 pct of GDP, was 1.2 pct down on a monthly basis against expectations of a 0.1 pct improvement

The latest reading is the weakest sine October 2001 if the effects of the Jubilee holidays on the figure for June 2002 were to be excluded

On a year-on-year basis, industrial production, was 1.1 pct lower, in contrast to the 0.4 pct fall anticipated

The March numbers also bring into focus data for the first quarter of the year. In both manufacturing and industrial production, the latest quarter is the weakest since the third quarter of 2004. In the latest three months, the statistics office revealed that both manufacturing output and industrial production were 0.7 pct lower than the previous three months

Compared with a year ago, the three month rate for industrial production was down 0.8 pct while manufacturing was up 0.2 pct

If all other factors remain equal, the latest data will slash 0.13 percentage points from overall GDP growth in the first quarter of 2004, currently estimated at 0.6 pct quarter-on-quarter

The figures add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that UK interest rates have reached their peak at. 4.65 pct in the current cycle.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (29668)5/9/2005 10:18:16 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
UPDATE 3-Oil up, OPEC says pumping near full tilt
Monday, May 9, 2005 1:55:30 PM
reuters.com

(Updates throughout)

LONDON, May 9 (Reuters) - Oil prices held above $51 on Monday and OPEC's president said the cartel will keep pumping near full tilt, ignoring its system of formal production quotas.

U.S. light crude <CLc1> was up 9 cents to $51.05 a barrel, while London Brent crude <LCOc1> gained 23 cents to $51.00.

Prices are barely $7 below record peaks struck last month, even though OPEC producers have ramped up output to build a cushion of oil stocks ahead of an expected fourth quarter demand surge.

"I think now we are dealing with the production without the quotas," said Kuwaiti oil minister Sheikh Ahmad al-Fahd al-Sabah, also OPEC President.

Robust demand growth in the United States and China has helped propel prices to record highs, despite fears that higher energy costs will ultimately undermine economic growth.

"Oil around $50 has a depressing effect, had a depressing effect on the global economy," European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said on Monday at a meeting of central bankers from the G10 group of rich and developing nations.

Only Saudi Arabia now holds significant spare production capacity. Saudi officials said the kingdom last month pumped just over 9.5 million barrels per day (bpd) -- leaving spare capacity of 1.5 million bpd.

Kuwait's Sheikh Ahmad said he believed Saudi Arabia had raised production to almost 10 million bpd this month.

OPEC's production surge has helped push U.S. crude stocks to 327 million barrels, their highest level in nearly six years.

"Crude stocks will probably keep building until the refineries increase runs to produce more gasoline for the summer driving season by the end of May," said Tony Nunan of Mistubish Corp in Tokyo.

OPEC, which controls half the world's crude exports, meets again on June 15 in Vienna to chart production strategy for the second half of the year.

Supply growth in other parts of the world has fallen below expectations in part because a surge in Russian output has tailed off.

Algeria's oil minister Chakib Khelil said at the weekend that even if OPEC pumps at full capacity it may not be able to meet strong fourth quarter demand without sufficient inventories being built up beforehand.

"What you need to do is raise stocks in the third quarter to accumulate enough of them in the third quarter that you can deplete stocks and maintain a high level of production for the fourth quarter," Khelil told Reuters.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (29668)5/9/2005 10:19:07 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 116555
 
Great. But remember, Bellamy Road had a stellar record until Saturday. <G>



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (29668)5/9/2005 12:21:49 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Oil Futures Signal Higher Inventories, Lower Prices for Crude
2005-05-05 10:13 (New York)

By Mark Shenk
May 5 (Bloomberg) -- Gene Edwards, head of oil supply and
trading at Valero Energy Corp., the third-largest U.S. refiner,
has 1 million to 2 million extra barrels of oil in his company's
storage tanks.
Edwards is among the refiners, brokers and traders adding
oil to inventories because spot prices are cheaper than futures
for crude delivered later in the year, a price difference traders
call ``contango.' Contango ``tells us to buy a little extra,'
Edwards said in an April 19 interview.
At today's prices, the money saved buying oil for June
instead of July more than pays the cost of storing it,
encouraging buyers such as Edwards to hold more. The contango, at
its widest since at least 1998, is also a sign to some investors
that crude prices are poised to fall further.
``This is a seriously bearish indicator,' said Michael
Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research, a
Winchester, Massachusetts, consultant. ``The contango reflects
concern about supply later this year, but the rise in inventories
can't be ignored forever.'
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan cited contango in an
April 5 speech, saying that it ``could encourage enough of an
inventory buffer to damp the current price frenzy,' which the
day before had pushed oil to a record $58.28 a barrel on the New
York Mercantile Exchange.
Oil prices are off 14 percent from the April 4 peak. The
June futures contract, known as the ``front-month' because it is
closest to delivery, rose 32 cents to $50.45 at 10:07 a.m. in New
York. June was $1.75 cheaper than July and $3.40 cheaper than oil
for December.
Oil prices dropped in April as U.S. crude oil inventories
climbed to the highest in almost six years. Supplies in storage
are up 13 percent so far this year, to 327 million barrels as of
April 29, according to Energy Department data.

Contango, Backwardation

The contango in the oil market developed over the past five
months. For most of last year, the front month was more expensive
than later delivery dates -- a price relationship called
``backwardation.' Oil was in backwardation 80 percent of the
time over the past three years, based on New York futures prices
for the front and second months.
Contango, from the word ``continue,' and backwardation are
terms that came into use in the English stock market in the 19th
century. The Oxford English Dictionary cites a magazine from 1860
as the source of the saying, ``The Bear a good contango loves,
the Bull a backwardation.'
The other periods of contango in New York oil futures over
the past decade occurred after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in
2001 and during the Asian financial crisis in 1998, when prices
were sliding to a 12-year low near $10 a barrel. These were times
when unexpected interruptions of demand cut prices.

`Unprecedented'

``When futures were in contango in 1998, the market was in
the absolute doldrums,' said Rick Mueller, an analyst with
Energy Security Analysis Inc. in Wakefield, Massachusetts.
After Sept. 11, buyers assumed demand would rebound, and
they priced oil for delivery in future months and years
accordingly, wrote Deutsche Bank analysts Paul Sankey and Adam
Sieminski. As the front month dropped below $18 a barrel, buyers
remained willing to pay as much as $24 for later months, they
said in a May 1 note to clients.
Today's contango, during a time of high prices, is ``totally
unprecedented,' Sankey and Sieminski wrote. Because a contango
like this hasn't happened before, both a bearish and a bullish
interpretation should be considered, they said.

`Overflowing'

The oil market ``may even collapse, as storage is
overflowing,' they wrote. Alternatively, demand will pick up as
drivers hit the road for vacations this summer and boost gasoline
demand, providing ``yet more proof' that global output can't
keep pace with demand. That could push New York prices to $60,
they said.
The market contango ``perfectly reflects the market
sentiment,' said John Kilduff, senior vice president of energy
risk management with Fimat USA Inc. in New York. ``There is a
tremendous fear that fourth-quarter demand will outpace supply.
In the meantime we are sitting on multiyear high inventories. It
pays to stockpile before the impending shortfall.'
If that view is correct, refiners such as Valero will look
smart for having filled their storage tanks.
``Basically it costs 35-to-40 cents a month to store oil,'
said Ed Silliere, vice president of risk management at Energy
Merchant Intermarket Futures LLC in New York. Finance charges may
bring that to 50 cents a barrel per month.
By comparison, the contango between the front-month contract
and the second month has been more than $1 for almost five weeks.
When spreads are as large as they have been in the past month,
``you are going to do storage,' Silliere said.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (29668)5/9/2005 12:28:45 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
This report is about GM, insofar as GM is representative of a mindset. Managers have treated GM as a career investment vehicle. Workers have treated it as a rich uncle who will always be there with money. Investors have treated GM as if the company were not subject to the reality of long-term increases in medical care costs.

In retrospect, the experts say all of this was visible years ago. But the share price of GM indicates that nobody paid any attention until it was too late.

This is why I am not impressed by economists who assure the public that Social Security/Medicare are not out of control, that there is time to maneuver.

Nobody in charge ever seems to maneuver until the investment vehicle goes into a skid on an icy road in the mountains. Bad news is dismissed as irrelevant. Statistical reality is deferred by investors until they finally start unloading shares. Then there is not much that the people in charge can do to solve the problem.

If highly sophisticated investors are this naïve about where their money is being invested, why should we expect politicians to tell us the truth about the looming insolvency of Social Security/Medicare?

full article by Gary North:
lewrockwell.com



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (29668)5/9/2005 4:47:12 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
It is very reasonable to expect oil prices to drop even considerably in the next 24 months. The long term trend is likely straight up, but I expect 35 oil before 80 oil, barring a geopolitical surprise. I think 80 oil first means the charade in the US (and China) has to keep going through next summer, and I just don't see that happening.