SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcos who wrote (161674)5/10/2005 8:10:51 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Thanks for writing that up. Very interesting stuff.

When the Articles of Confederation were put together, the Canadians, Quebec was invited to join in. Though I've only seen the simple statement that they declined the offer, with no sense of whether it was seriously considered or rejected with hysterical laughter. Are you aware of any other historical detail on the offer?

A lot of the 'rights of man' political philosophy stuff that forms US rhetoric regarding those days was actually shared by many british whigs ... in fact, there were far more whigs in the UK than in the colonies, there were liberal thinkers all over Europe, not too many years later the name Liberales would first be applied to anti-imperialists in Spain ... this is not generally recognised in the US, where Liberty is seen as made-in-the-USA with no imported parts, no Magna Carta, no old saxon assemblies, no tradition of rights of the english yeoman ... at least, that's the impression gained from Hollywood and most internet threads.

It seems to me that the formation of American Democracy was closer to a notch up in the evolution of government than it was to a great leap forward. Virtually all of the State governments in the US are based in British common law; Louisiana is based in French law. Unfortunately, our grammar school education in history has been quite lacking. There's very little ever down with a view of multiple perspectives. We'll portray the Boston Tea Party, for example, as soley an act of rebellion over British oppression. One can have the perspective that it was nothing more than a criminal act that spun into an act of patriotism when Britain retaliated with the Boston Port Act. Not the brightest move by England, but understandable as they were fending off illegal tea trafficing to the colonies.

jttmab