Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (16837)	5/10/2005 4:34:02 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

seattlepi.nwsource.com

To: tsigprofit who wrote (16837)	5/10/2005 11:17:55 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 20773

No, their answer is to put an end to an unprecedented act of obstructionism by the Democrats. All they need do is make a rule change that is within their purview. ....In the last Congress, the president submitted 34 appeals court nominees to the Senate. A minority of senators blocked up-or-down votes to 10 of those nominees and threatened to deny votes to another six. This was unprecedented in 214 years of Senate history. Now, in the new Congress, the same minority of senators says it will continue its campaign of judicial obstruction. And, even worse, if they don't get their way, they threaten to shut down the Senate and obstruct government itself. Message 21276767