Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (232220)	5/10/2005 4:30:55 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572941

"Huh? I am not a scientist...." Your questions support that statement. There is no empirical evidence to support the evolutionary hypothesis. Without the demonstration of a beneficial mutation there is not empirical evidence. We must observe one species evolving into a new viable species before we can elevate the evolutionary hypothesis to the level of a theory. It's never been done. Some years back I visited Argonne National Laboratory in conjunction with my wife's work on her dissertation in mutational genetics. Argonne is one of the premiere genetic research laboratories in the world. The Bioscience labs had been attempting to produce a beneficial mutation for several decades and had failed completely. They summarize their efforts in a neat booklet beneficial mutations available from: anl.gov anl.gov