Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pam who wrote (28193)	5/10/2005 8:42:32 PM
From: pompsander	Respond to of 60323

An injunction should only be granted if there is irreparable harm that will be done by allowing the offending action to occur. In those events where an irreversible event would occur (think of ending someone on life support as a dramatic example), an injunction may be necessary until facts and damages can be fully weighed. In the Toshiba/Lexar case money will solve all transgressions proven to occur, both past and current. Unless Toshiba fails to cooperate with the legal process, I don't seee the injunction as a great threat. However, if I am wrong, well..I am wrong. <g>