Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (681977)	5/11/2005 10:56:52 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Operation Matador Helping Flush Insurgents From Western Iraq May 10, 2005 By Donna Miles American Forces Press Service WASHINGTON – Troops fighting in Iraq's northwestern Anbar province are facing a sizable and skilled insurgency, with some members seen fighting in military uniforms and protective vests, the Joint Staff's director of operations told Pentagon reporters here today. Marine Lt. Gen. James T. Conway said the effort, dubbed Operation Matador, is focused on eliminating insurgents and foreign fighters occupying the region, a known smuggling route and sanctuary for foreign fighters. The area also is used as a staging area where foreign fighters receive weapons and equipment for their attacks in the more populated key cities of Baghdad, Ramadi, Fallujah and Mosul, according to U.S. Central Command officials. Conway said the region has witnessed a buildup of insurgents since the fall of Fallujah, when they began moving west. Acknowledging that Anbar province is "a huge piece of terrain," Conway said the coalition is operating out of fixed locations, conducting patrols to find insurgent operating areas, then "going after them." The strategy is the same one used elsewhere in Iraq, he said. "Where we find insurgents, we will attack them, and we will capture and kill them if they resist," he said. Operation Matador does not specifically target al Qaeda terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who reportedly was seen in the area within the past three weeks. However, "it would be a welcome event to come across him or his body," the general said. Conway said he's not surprised by the strength and capability of the insurgency being encountered. "We know this is a determined enemy, that he has the skill and ordnance (and) the weapons to be able to resist fiercely, as we are seeing here," he said. "So this should not be a surprise to us when it happens." While declining to provide details about tactics being employed while the operation is under way, Conway said the coalition is depending heavily on combined arms operations. The Marines' 2nd Regimental Combat Team is a key player in the effort, he said. So far, three U.S. Marines have been killed and fewer than 20 wounded in the operation, he said. Conway said he is leaving it to commanders on the ground to ensure they have enough troops in the area to handle the mission. Also in Iraq, Conway reported a "tenfold" surge in reports of criminal and insurgent activity called into the Iraqi tips hotline during the first week since the Iraqis took over its operation from U.S. forces in Baghdad. "We see that as a testament to the determination of those Iraqis who want to see a safe and stable country," he said.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (681977)	5/11/2005 12:20:57 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

"Historically stocks have outperformed bonds," Depends on the period you are looking at. There are several LONG multi-decade stretches where they have not. "and a blend of the two has outperformed either." True... and risk-adjusted performance is even better when other asset classes (real assets & or commodities, foreign, short positions, etc.) are included in the mix. So why doesn't the proposal ennunciated by the Prez allow any of those? Why does it keep the so-called 'private' accounts in the hands of the government? Why would it force most participants to trade their investments for an annunity at retirement? Why the 'claw-back' provision? You see, I'm not against 'privitization' schemes at all... just the bad ones. "President Bush must want what is best for his people." .... (no comment).