Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (16899)	5/11/2005 3:08:20 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20773

Help! I am being tried in absentia lol and they are preparin a hangin' over here: Message 21314550 lol I will not sleep tonight waiting for the trial to finish....lol t

To: American Spirit who wrote (16899)	5/11/2005 6:15:44 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

HUFFINGTON POST: Bush Re-election 'Biggest Crime in History of the Nation'! bradblog.com <<...COMMENT #83 [link] ...Robert Lockwood Mills said on 5/11/2005 @ 2:43am PT... Jim Lampley is a boxing broadcaster now. The difference between a guy who covers prize fights and other sportscasters is that his business has been presumed crooked for years...and is. I'm sure Jim Lampley could tell you which of the fights he's covered were honest and which weren't. The last televised fight I watched from beginning to end was a title fight in Atlantic City about 10 years ago involving Michael Spinks. As I recall his opponent was named "Davis." Davis won nearly every round, boxed rings around Spinks, and not only didn't they give him the decision, but Spinks was called the winner by a wide margin. All I could think of was my late father's warning, "Bobby, don't ever bet on a prize fight." It was disgraceful. Davis was from Delaware. As I recall it, Delaware's congressman had seen the fight on TV himself, and was horrified. He launched an investigation, which went nowhere. The lesson? Powerful forces are at work behind the scenes whenever a title fight or an election is rigged. By the way, if anyone is still worried about CB and his Las Vegas analysis, remember what happened in Ireland. That's where Intrade is located, and where the REALLY BIG BETS are placed on world events. Intrade called EVERY SINGLE STATE correctly in the 2004 election, a possibility so remote Las Vegas oddsmakers wouldn't even book it. This tells us about vote rigging. The big bettors knew where it was being done; once you've rigged a machine to flip votes from Kerry to Bush in a state, all that's needed is a few people to monitor the count to make sure enough votes have been flipped. In fact, the riggers didn't do a perfect job; in Pennsylvania, the exit polls showed Kerry 8% ahead and he won by 2%...in other words, they flipped 6% of the votes, and it wasn't enough. THE EXIT POLLS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO RIGGING, BECAUSE THEY REFLECT INDIVIDUAL VOTERS' STATED PREFERENCES. THEY ARE NOT ELECTRONIC. THEY ARE NOT FLIPPABLE, THEY DON'T HAVE SOURCE CODES, AND THEY WERE DEADLY ACCURATE IN EVERY STATE THAT USED PAPER BALLOTS PREDOMINANTLY. THEY WERE ALSO DEADLY ACCURATE IN THE FLORIDA SENATE RACE. Jim Lampley is smart enough to understand this. Let's make sure other sites link up with huffingtonpost.com, so that the word gets out...>>