SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JeffA who wrote (103874)5/12/2005 2:17:32 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I think you are really posting that hit piece on PETA because you said the organics movement was nothing, essentially, and I proved you wrong. I don't think you're really interested in whether what you PERCEIVE as my blind loyalty to any organization is worth my effort. Just to be clear, I have no loyalty to PETA whatsoever. I am not a member of PETA. When they run campaigns that are interesting I let people know about them. I thought the mothers' day poetry contest was worthwhile, as well as the Pamela Anderson video about KFC chicken abuse. But it is not PETA that I am interested in or loyal to--it is the much larger issue of animal rights in general.

I don't know what the real story is about the animals in PETA's shelter. Since the Center for Consumer Freedom has posted a billboard in Times Square about it, I am sure PETA will respond, and then we can all sort out what we feel about the subject.

HOWEVER, I must point out that the Center for Consumer Freedom is a VILE right wing organization of the worst sort. The real story is that animal rights and vegetarians, as well as the organic farming industry in general threaten the companies that the Center is the mouthpiece for, including fast food corporations and Monsanto (no surprise there)! I'm going to post two exposes of this organization below. Well worth reading! These people don't care about the situation in PETA's shelter--they are fighting for the profits of the companies that support them.

organicconsumers.org

PR Watch Exposes "Anti-Organic" Center for Consumer Freedom
7/2/2003

Web Note: One of the most vicious corporate front groups in America is the so-called Center for Consumer Freedom, which specializes in attacking the organic movement and public interest groups opposed to genetic engineering and industrial agriculture.

The Organic Consumers Association and our allies have been frequent targets for the CCF over the past few years. OCA's public interest ally PR Watch

has published an excellent expose of CCF and its founder and chief propagandist, Rick Berman. Among CCF's major funders are Coca-Cola, Cargill, Tyson Foods, and Monsanto.

See disinfopedia.org

Center for Consumer Freedom From Disinfopedia, the encyclopedia of propaganda.

The Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) (formerly called the "Guest Choice Network") is a front group for the restaurant, alcohol and tobacco industries. It runs media campaigns which oppose the efforts of scientists, doctors, health advocates, environmentalists and groups like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, calling them "the Nanny Culture ‹ the growing fraternity of food cops, health care enforcers, anti-meat activists, and meddling bureaucrats who 'know what's best for you.' " CCF is one of the more active of several front groups created by Berman & Co., a public affairs firm owned by lobbyist Rick Berman.

Based in Washington, DC, Berman & Co. represents the tobacco industry as well as hotels, beer distributors, taverns, and restaurant chains. The group actively opposes smoking bans and lowering the legal blood-alcohol level, while targeting studies on the dangers of red meat consumption, overfishing and pesticides. Each year they give out the "nanny awards" to groups who, according to them, try to tell consumers how to live their lives.

Anyone who criticizes tobacco, alcohol, fatty foods or soda pop is likely to come under attack from CCF. Its enemies list has included such diverse groups and individuals as the Alliance of American Insurers; the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; the American Medical Association; the Arthritis Foundation; the Consumer Federation of America; New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani; the Harvard School of Public Health; the Marin Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems; the National Association of High School Principals; the National Safety Council; the National Transportation Safety Board; the Office of Highway Safety for the state of Georgia; Ralph Nader's group, Public Citizen; the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); and the U.S. Department of Transportation.

In a 1999 interview with the Chain Leader, a trade publication for restaurant chains, Berman boasted that he attacks activists more aggressively than other lobbyists. "We always have a knife in our teeth," he said. Since activists "drive consumer behavior on meat, alcohol, fat, sugar, tobacco and caffeine," his strategy is "to shoot the messenger. ... We've got to attack their credibility as spokespersons." In a May 11, 2002 San Francisco Chronicle article, CCF spokesman John Doyle responded to questions about nationwide radio ads put out by the group.

He said the ads were meant to attract people to their website and "draw attention to our enemies: just about every consumer and environmental group , chef, legislator or doctor who raises objections to things like pesticide use, genetic engineering of crops or antibiotic use in beef and poultry."[1] (http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/a/2002/05/11/MN119037.DT L) Personnel CCF is registered as a tax-exempt nonprofit organization.

The IRS Form 990 filed for the the six-month period from July to December 1999 by CCF (then calling itself the Guest Choice Network), listed the following officers: € Richard Berman, executive director. € Ray Kraftson, director € Dixie L. Berman, secretary/treasurer € Dan Popeo, director (Popeo is also chairman of the Washington Legal Foundation, a corporate-funded right-wing think tank which paid him $301,593 in salary and benefits in 2000.) € Allison Whitesides, director (Whitesides has also worked as a public relations representative for Coca-Cola North America and Outback Steakhouse.. In November 2001, she went to work as a legislative representative for the National Restaurant Association.) The CCF also has an advisory panel. In 1998 it included the following individuals: € Dave Albright, National Steak & Poultry € Jane Innes, Perkins Family Restaurants, L.P. € Steve Bartlett, Meridian Products Corporation € Robert Basham, Outback Steakhouse, Inc. € John F. Berglund, Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association € Lou Chatey, Sebastiani Vineyards € [[H.A. "Andy" Divine]], University of Denver € Timothy J. Doke, Brinker International, Inc. € Richard Fisher, Tetley USA, Inc. € William L. Hyde, Jr., Ruth's Chris Steakhouse € James Spector, Philip Morris, USA € Michael Middleton, Cargill Processed Meat Products € Daniel J. Popeo, Washington Legal Foundation € Richard G. Scalise, Armour Swift-Eckrich € Daniel Timm, the Bruss Company € Carl Vogt, Fulbright & Jaworski € Richard Walsh, Darden Restaurants, Inc. € Terry Wheatley, Sutter Home Winery In addition to these officers, several Berman & Co. employees and associates have appeared in news stories as CCF representatives: € Mike Burita has worked for a variety of conservative causes, including Republican election campaigns, Phyllis Schlafly, Frontiers of Freedom, and Brent Bozell's Media Research Center. € John Doyle, communications director for Berman & Co., also doubles as a spokesman for the CCF, the Employment Policies Institute and the American Beverage Institute. € On February 24, 2000, the Washington Post reported that Tom Lauria, "who helped peddle the tobacco industry's message at the Tobacco Institute before the lobby group was dismantled last year as part of an agreement with the states," had been hired as director of communications for CCN (then named the Guest Choice Network). Lauria left Berman's employ sometime in 2001. € David Martosko has been described in news stories as CCN's director of research.

Affiliated Organizations In addition to the Center for Consumer Freedom, Berman & Co. sponsors several other organizations and web sites, including the Employment Policies Institute (which fights to keep the minimum wage low and opposes mandatory health insurance for workers), and the American Beverage Institute, which opposes restrictions on drinking and driving. History Berman launched the Guest Choice Network in 1995.

Its initial funding came entirely from the Philip Morris tobacco company. "I'd lke to propose to Philip Morris the establishment of the Guest Choice Network," Berman stated in a December 11, 1995 letter to Barbara Trach (http://www.prwatch.org/documents/berman/berman600k.pdf), PM's senior program manager for public affairs. "The concept is to unite the restaurant and hospitality industries in a campaign to defend their consumers and marketing programs against attacks from anti-smoking, anti-drinking, anti-meat, etc. activists. ... I would like to solicit Philip Morris for an initial contribution of $600,000." The purpose of the Guest Choice Network, as Berman explained in a separate planning document (http://www.prwatch.org/documents/berman/gcplan.pdf), would be to enlist operators of "restaurants, hotels, casinos, bowling alleys, taverns, stadiums, and university hospitality educators" to "support mentality of 'smokers rights' by encouraging responsibility to protect 'guest choice.'"

According to a yearend 1995 budget (http://www.prwatch.org/documents/berman/budget.pdf), Guest Choice planned to spend $1.5 million during its first 13 months of operation, including $390,000 for "membership marketing/materials development," $430,000 to establish a communication center and newsletter (which Berman promised would have a "60% to 70% smoking focus" (http://www.prwatch.org/documents/berman/gcplan.pdf)), $110,000 to create a "multi-industry advisory council," and $345,000 for "grassroots network development/operation." The tobacco company complied with Berman's initial funding request for $600,000 (http://www.prwatch.org/documents/berman/pm600k.pdf) and pitched in another $300,000 early the following year. "As of this writing, PM USA is still the only contributor, though Berman continues to promise others any day now," wrote Philip Morris attorney Marty Barrington in an internal company memorandum dated March 28, 1996 (http://www.prwatch.org/documents/berman/pm300k.pdf). Aside from Philip Morris, there are no other publicly-known funders of Guest Choice until its public launch two years later, in April 1998, sporting an advisory board comprised mostly of representatives from the restaurant, meat and alcoholic beverage industries.

In November 2001, the Guest Choice Network launched a separate web site, ActivistCash.com, which purports to expose the "hidden funding" of various activist groups that support animal rights, food safety and smoking prevention. In January 2002 the Guest Choice Network renamed itself as the Center for Consumer Freedom. In early 2002, CCF ran national radio ads targeting studies on the link between food consumption and health. One ad referred to "red-faced picketers wielding pointed wooden sticks with signs that read 'eat tofu or die' on the way to your classic cheeseburger and fries."

lobbywatch.org

Center for Consumer Freedom
The Center for Consumer Freedom is run by Rick Berman's PR firm, Berman & Company Inc., based in Washington DC. It aggressively targets groups seeking to promote controls relating to alcohol, tobacco, food safety, animal rights or the environment.

It was known as the Guest Choice Network (aka NannyCulture.com) which was launched in 1995 with $600,000 from tobacco giant, Philip Morris.

Thanks to a whistle-blower, it is known that Monsanto donated $200,000 to the Guest Choice Network in 2001, making it one of the Network's highest donors other than Philip Morris. Then in January 2002 Guest Choice relaunched itself as the Center for Consumer Freedom.

The Guest Choice /Consumer Freedom campaign on 'Food Technology' involves smearing organic food as dangerous and promoting what it calls 'genetically improved' food. Despite being pro-consumer choice, the Consumer Freedom campaign vehemently opposes GM food labelling.

Those it labels 'anti-biotech extremists' include not just mainstream environmental groups, such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, which it accuses of conducting a 'public relations jihad' on the issue, but even organisations like Christian Aid, a development agency of the churches in the UK and Ireland. Berman & Co. labelled the charity a 'far-left leaning' group that 'flat-out lies about GE foods'. These 'future-fearing radicals hide behind a religious facade to more easily malign farmers, scientists, food companies, and even PR people who deal with GE foods,' it says.






To: JeffA who wrote (103874)5/18/2005 3:10:20 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Jeff, in response to your post about the rightwing organization who posted the billboard in Times Square alleging that PETA kills a lot of animals in its shelter, I wrote to PETA asking for some clarification. This is their response. As you or anyone else who is interested can see, the billboard was just an attempted smear by the factory farm folks and others who make huge profits from animal cruelty, and has no basis in fact:

- - - - - - - -

Thank you for contacting PETA about the "PETA Kills Animals" billboard and the accompanying promotions for it.

We believe a lot of good will come from this shabby attempt to undermine PETA’s efforts to help animals. This campaign, as you may know, is the work of the deceitfully named Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF), a front group for Philip Morris, Outback Steakhouse, KFC, logging interests, cattle ranchers, and other animal exploiters who kill millions of animals every year, not out of pity, but out of greed. These companies are concerned about the strides that PETA is making that are changing their industries and compelling them to take animal welfare concerns seriously, so they hope to scare people away from caring about animals by spending millions on ads like this. To learn more about CCF—which USA Today recently opined should rename itself FatforProfit.com—please see the following Web sites:

· consumerdeception.com

· citizensforethics.org

· prospect.org

PETA can’t afford billboards in Times Square, so we’re grateful for the opportunity that this one provides to discuss the animal overpopulation crisis. We are on the front lines of the battle to turn back the tide of unwanted dogs and cats, and we need you to help.

Our caseworkers tirelessly rescue homeless animals from environmental dangers, as well as cruelty and neglect (http://www.PETA.org/feat/cap/). They crawl through sewers, poke through junkyards, climb trees, and dodge traffic in order to reach animals in danger. During floods and storms, they are out saving lives at all hours.

We do not run a traditional shelter. In fact, we refer every healthy, cute, young animal we can to shelters. And some of the animals we rescue are lost companions whom we are able to joyfully reunite with their families. Of the homeless animals we take in ourselves, the healthy and adoptable ones are fostered, adopted, or taken to local shelters. However, most of the animals we receive are broken beings for whom euthanasia is, without a doubt, the most humane option. To learn more, please see our factsheet at peta.org.

To cite a local instance, our caseworkers were able to gain custody of a dog—locked to a 15 pound chain—who was starved until she was severely emaciated. We had to carry her into the emergency clinic because she could barely walk. On the doctor’s advice, we gave her food and water in a comfortable room and monitored her progress overnight but, by the next morning, she couldn’t keep the food down, so we rushed her again to see a veterinarian. He recommended euthanasia due to the severity of her condition, she was in a lot of pain and faced an agonizing, lingering death otherwise. The most humane option for her was a peaceful and dignified release from her suffering. We are pursuing criminal charges against the person responsible for her condition.

On another occasion, when a power-line transformer explosion burned a flock of starlings, PETA was the only agency to come to the birds’ aid; if our trained technicians had not been ready to end these starlings’ misery, the injured birds would have suffered in agony for days before finally succumbing to a painful death. We also provide free euthanasia services for local residents who have very sick, critically injured, or geriatric companions but can’t afford to take them to a veterinarian. One family, lacking money for vet care and transportation, turned to us for help for their cat, who had barely crawled back home after being mauled by a pack of dogs. We were able to help by giving the cat a peaceful end to her intense pain.

The best way to save the lives of homeless animals is to reduce their numbers through spay/neuter programs, such as PETA’s mobile SNIP (Spay and Neuter Immediately, Please) clinic, which brings low-cost and free alterations and other procedures to low-income neighborhoods (http://www.HelpingAnimals.com/i-nobirth-snip.html). Since every animal purchased from a pet store or breeder means that another homeless animal must die, adopting an animal from a shelter or rescue group is the only responsible way to bring a furry friend into your life (http://www.PETA.org/factsheet/files/FactsheetDisplay.asp?ID=29).

To learn more about what PETA is doing for companion animals and how you can help, please see the following Web sites:

· Save homeless animals: helpinganimals.com

· More ways to help dogs and cats: helpinganimals.com

· Become an activist for animals: animalactivist.com

Thanks again for writing and for your compassion for animals. We hope this information is helpful, and we look forward to working with you to save animals’ lives!

Sincerely,





The PETA Staff

peta.org