Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (20000)	5/12/2005 2:10:09 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 28931

"Your clear point has consistently been the unborn are not human persons and they should not be afforded any more value than an unwanted parasite" That is a lie. I have always opposed abortion as birth control. I have always supported the RIGHT to remove life support from ANY parasite in ones body. The VALUE of the fertilized egg is strictly for the lovers to decide--and even more strictly...for the woman to decide. "The Nazi's did it and abortionists are quick studies" My old library is almost entirely gone. But I still have "Sex and Society in Nazi Germany" by Hans Peter Bleuel (1973). You really ought to read some of the literature instead of simply spouting thoughtless commentary with the hope that it is correct. The Nazi elite were a weird collection of mediocre people from average stations in life who had homosexuals right at the top and throughout their ranks but usually allowed them for various reasons. Homosexuals in the masses were executed because they (the elite) were truly obsessed with the gene pool and how to keep (not only the babies coming)--but the RIGHT babies). One of the things which so conflicted them was that so many of the greatest people from the past had been homosexuals who had (presumably) terminated their gene structure by not fathering. So did you murder them or did you force them to have intercourse and then murder them? The basic difference between preventing conception (so that no new life is created) and killing a living Human being is apparently too much for you to grasp" I grasp it far better than you do. There is no fundamental moral difference between killing the poor swimming sperm before it reaches the egg or just after it reaches the egg--no difference whatsoever. "Your bigoted ignorance speaks for itself." Your standard "argument" when you have had your ass kicked over and over and over! WOW, greg or e! What a SPLENDID "argument"!!