SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (113699)5/14/2005 10:24:31 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
didn't pat write a book prior on Germany and ww2 and i believe his position was the same about burning Jews etc. It seems he never had a problem or denies the history of Jewish struggles and horrors . He is a strange guy, with some very strange ideas.



To: LindyBill who wrote (113699)5/14/2005 11:39:07 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
By the numbers, joe stalin was the professonal exterminator, hitler by comparison was an amatuer. Evil mental cases have had all number of reasons to exterminate innocent humans for race, or creed or whatever. Buchanan may be an unreconstructed anti-semite. But the analysis strictly by the numbers of murdered for whatever reason by evil doers in WWII and afterwards does not prove that proffer. How many tens of millions died after WW II because of joe.

I did not read Revisionist history, I read an alternative perspective on looking at the consequences of actions taken.

If by We you mean the USA, well Germany declared war on us. What would have occured if France and England had not given hitler the reason for taking all the gold and riches and industrial logistics of Western Europe to fund his war efforts, I don't know. Would that have impacted his ability to invade Russia more or less effectively?

Japs would have been pissed at us anyway. Would hilter be just as stupid and declare war on the USA?