Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (232739)	5/14/2005 12:39:15 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575761

"An unusual number of last minute registrations in areas that went strongly for Kerry combined with general evidence of fraud suggest that the fraud favored Kerry." Why? Those areas were strong for Kerry anyway. It is not like they were polling strong for Bush and unexpectedly went for Kerry. Like in Ohio where areas that were polling for Kerry before the election, and the exit polls showed a win for Kerry strangely went for Bush...

To: TimF who wrote (232739)	5/14/2005 4:17:02 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575761

An unusual number of last minute registrations in areas that went strongly for Kerry combined with general evidence of fraud suggest that the fraud favored Kerry. Yes it isn't hard evidence, it isn't proof of any sort but the facts suggest fraud that favored Kerry. Similar things were turned up here although the numbers were not as large as those in WI. After all the brouhaha raised by the GOP, it turns out that the fraud/mistakes etc were done proportionally so that Rossi, the GOP, candidate will still lose the governor's race after allowances are made for all the mistakes. I suspect the same is true in WI and that Kerry won by a slim but substantive number. Of course, there is the other issue which is that Kerry should have done much better in WI than he did. ted