Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (61474)	5/15/2005 11:08:28 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 81568

Speaking of throwing out every tin-foil-hat conspiracy to come down the pike: ...."Considering that the major excuse for going to war against Iraq has been proven to be a big fat lie, it is clear exactly who were being manipulated." It seems you did not listen to Bush and all of his speeches about Iraq. You are so focused on "stockpiles" of WMD's that you have ignored everything else Bush said. The bottom line is that Bush was right to remove Saddam based solely on the facts. The Iraq Survey Group report provides ample evidence to support those facts. Bush repeatedly mentioned that Saddam had failed to comply with UN Resolutions for more than 12 years. All of the resolutions included references to complete compliance with UN Resolution #687......... The Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement - AKA - UN Resolution #687, was a ZERO TOLERANCE policy. That meant Saddam had to; 1) Completely eliminate every aspect of his WMD PROGRAMS (not just "stockpiles"). This included provisions for the complete destruction of all offensive weapons. This had to be done in a completely verifiable manner to UN Inspectors. 2) Saddam had to completely eliminate every tie to terrorists (internal & external). 3) Saddam had to completely halt his crimes against humanity. 4) Saddam had to make full reparations to Kuwait, ET AL. Now this was the short & sweet version. There were absolutely no provisions that allowed any deviation from each explicit requirement. It meant 100%, unconditional compliance. Every single UN Resolution, including Resolution 1441 was irrevocably tied to #687. Saddam spent more than 12 years in utter defiance of every one of the above requirements before Bush's so-called "rush to war". You know, where "Bush lied & misled" America into a "unilateral", "illegal" war to take over their oil for his Big Oil cronies? Text of UN Resolution 687 dalebroux.com Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD cia.gov

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (61474)	5/15/2005 11:47:25 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 81568

If Zarqawi doesn't exist the whole Bush war is a big fat lie. thisisrumorcontrol.org Tell me honestly, people. Can anyone say that Zarqawi exists as the leader of the insurgency in Iraq? If so, how many legs does he have? And how come he can race away from US troops like The Flash? What aboutb the leg Cheney's people told us he had amputated in Baghdad prior to the war, one of the main excuses Buehies used to invade. Zarqawi was the only "proof" of a Saddam-Al Qaida connection. And now we find out he's either an enigma or doesn't even exist.