SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (232935)5/15/2005 6:25:44 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575582
 
Richard Clarke was one of your poster childs for 9/11 hate against Bush. Now he's not credible? Try quality posts instead of quantity ted, they won't come back to discredit you....

First, I think people who need to remain employable say things very carefully when under testimony so that their supervisors are not directly implicated. You understand that whistle blowers often have a hard time landing a new job, don't you?

Secondly, you seem to forget what he actually said under testimony:

"Recently, however, Richard Clarke, the former head of anti-terrorism at the National Security Council, gave some answers while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on terrorism. "I do recall the State Department coming to us that week [after September 11]," Clarke testified,
saying that the Saudi Embassy felt that in the wake of the terrorist attacks, Arabs in this country, particularly Saudis, might be victims of retribution attacks, and they wanted therefore to take some Saudi students and the Saudi citizens back to their kingdom for safety, and could they be given permission to fly, even though we had grounded all flights. Now, what I recall is that I asked for flight manifests of everyone on board and all of those names need to be directly and individually vetted by the FBI before they were allowed to leave the country. And I also wanted the FBI to sign off even on the concept of Saudis being allowed to leave the country. And as I recall, all of that was done. It is true that members of the bin Laden family were among those who left. We knew that at the time. I can't say much more in open session, but it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House."


Now Richard Clarke was working under a chain of command. Who do you think gave the FBI permission to sign off?

"What Clarke could not testify to was the thoroughness with which the FBI questioned the departing Saudis. Last year, National Review reported that the FBI conducted brief, day-of-departure interviews with the Saudis -- in the words of an FBI spokesman, "at the airport, as they were about to leave." Experts interviewed by National Review called the FBI's actions "highly unusual" given the fact that those departing were actually members of Osama bin Laden's family. "They [the FBI] could not have done a thorough and complete interview," said John L. Martin, the former head of internal security at the Justice Department."

findarticles.com

Why didn't the FBI check out these people more closely? Who told them to expedite passage of the Saudis out of this country?

Do you even for a second see how you've been manipulated and lied to? How the spin has clouded your thinking? The people behind your bike-riding president were the ones who pulled this thing off. The people whom you voted back into power in 2004. The ones who are so corrupted there is a smell in DC like never before. The people who got us into a war without end.