SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (5147)5/17/2005 9:16:16 AM
From: fresc  Respond to of 37415
 
I guess them P.C boys have been watching too much American politics lately :)



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (5147)5/17/2005 10:22:40 AM
From: Stephen O  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 37415
 
The former Reform was all for free votes in the House and they were laughed out of the system.
I'm afraid that we must change our constitution because God is mentioned in the preamable. Marriage was instituted to provide the safe place to bear and raise children. Marriage is in the eyes of God. By all means let everyone have their civil unions, partnerships but don't call it marriage.
What next, will we allow multiple partners and call that marriage. Well we have in Bountiful BC, but no politician wants to stick his neck out and stop it. What about Ted and his favourite goat. Sorry Teds of this world.
Yes let's have a free vote on the use of the word marriage.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (5147)5/17/2005 12:40:19 PM
From: Ichy Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37415
 
On Abortion
Not to debate it, but I think that until women sit down and discuss it, we won't know what exactly the policy should be. I am a man, this is a procedure I will never undergo, nor do I have any concept of the things that women undergo as they prepare to have children. I think this is NOT a debate for men, unless they are intimately involved.