Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (682485)	5/17/2005 9:23:44 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 769670

White House challenges UK Iraq memo Tuesday, May 17, 2005 Posted: 6:45 AM EDT (1045 GMT) WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Claims in a recently uncovered British memo that intelligence was "being fixed" to support the Iraq war as early as mid-2002 are "flat out wrong," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Monday. McClellan insisted the process leading up to the decision to go to war was "very public" -- and that the decision to invade in March 2003 was taken only after Iraq refused to comply with its "international obligations." "The president of the United States, in a very public way, reached out to people across the world, went to the United Nations and tried to resolve this in a diplomatic manner," McClellan said. "Saddam Hussein was the one, in the end, who chose continued defiance. And only then was the decision made, as a last resort, to go into Iraq." However, McClellan also said he had not seen the "specific memo," only reports of what it contained. Earlier this month, the Times of London published the minutes of a meeting of top British officials in mid-2002, including Prime Minister Tony Blair, Bush's staunchest ally in the Iraq war. According to the minutes cited by the Times, a British official identified as "C" said that he had returned from a meeting in Washington and that "military action was now seen as inevitable" by U.S. officials. "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy," the memo said, according to the newspaper. The minutes also quoted the unnamed British official as saying the U.S. National Security Council had "no patience" with taking the dispute to the United Nations and "no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record." "There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action," the official said, according to the minutes published by the Times. The memo also quoted British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon as saying that the final push to war would likely begin a month before the U.S. congressional elections in November 2002, with an actual attack coming in January 2003. President Bush did begin trying to build public support for military action against Iraq during the mid-term election, which saw Republicans pick up seats in both the House and Senate. The invasion came four months later, in March 2003. British officials have not disputed the authenticity of the memo published by the Times. After the minutes of the meeting became public, 89 Democratic members of Congress sent a letter to Bush asking for an explanation. The memo "raises troubling new questions regarding the legal justifications for the war, as well as the integrity of your administration," the letter said.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (682485)	5/17/2005 4:32:03 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

"The money has already been borrowed." No it has NOT. I'm speaking, of course, about the proposals to issue TRILLIONS in new debt obligations to finance a so-called 'transition to "private accounts" ' which are, in fact, not very private. There are other, better, proposals for reforming SS (including introducing true private accounts) that don't destroy future generations with mountains of debt, do give account holders greater investment choices and fewer Big Government restrictions, and STOP the ability of government to disguise structural deficits by stealing from SS --- that ability so loved by politicians to LIE to the public through use ofr smoke and Mirrors budgeting.... "It is a cancer which will kill the economy if we do not start treating it." Unfortunately, we have several 'cancers' afflicting our economy and nation now --- not the least of which is this Big Government, big-spending crowd in Washington now. (To take just one example, have you noticed that the influential defense periodical Janes Defense Weekly has just projected that NEXT YEAR'S US military budget will be LARGER then the combined military budgets of EVERY OTHER NATION ON EARTH PUT TOGETHER? Most of it on the 'credit card'.... Ridiculous.)