SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stephen O who wrote (5167)5/17/2005 4:18:46 PM
From: Ichy Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37416
 
Steven
The Fiberals are never going to go for a referendum, socialists are just not that fond of democracy. As for the word "marriage" we need a term to define all legal relationships where two persons are involved. As I watch the younger generation, I fear our efforts are in vain, they change their definitions faster and faster, us old folks better not think what laws we write is in anything more than ice cream, cause this new generation will change things the way they want pretty quick....

I recall when my Nieces found out I hung around in Yorkville in my decadent youth, they looked at me like they expected me to wander about in a cloud of Incense and Jefferson Airplane music.....

Imagine their children (your grand or great grand) trying to figure out what this debate was all about. This like many things will change, and then be forgotten.....



To: Stephen O who wrote (5167)5/17/2005 10:18:52 PM
From: fresc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37416
 
Ahh, a true Re-Former :) The Church is always looking for new ways in increasing there cash flow. It's Business!
If gays wish to suffer in Marriage like Hetro's do. I am all for it!