Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (17082)	5/17/2005 5:02:50 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

READ THIS CAREFULLY FOLKS <<...Potential defeat as in a civil war is beginning to be talked about in the media, but soon the reality of possible endless quagmire will become so obvious that it will be unavoidable. And public support for the war - already slipping into minority status - is likely to sink further. Some Republican members of the U.S. Congress are privately meeting to discuss how Bush falsely led the nation to war and how to get out. A May 5 Gallup poll showed that only 41 percent of Americans believe the war was worthwhile, while 57 percent do not. When public opinion drops further, more members of Congress will see an exit strategy as essential to their political survival or whether the Republicans maintain control of the House and Senate. With recently released official memos from Great Britain saying that the Bush Administration needed to "fix the intelligence" to support the war, 89 Democrat members of Congress have written the President for an explanation. Meeting minutes from July 23, 2002 labeled "secret and strictly personal ? U.K. eyes only," begin with the head of the British intelligence service, identified as "C," who just returned from Washington saying there had been a "perceptible shift in attitude. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and the facts were being fixed around the policy." How long can Congress ignore the crucial issue of impeachment -- accountability for the President who spoke so often of the need for people to be held responsible all through his 2000 presidential campaign?...>> bellaciao.org