Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (162396)	5/17/2005 5:43:43 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'd like to hear more on this, though I doubt we are talking about the same approach. In my method, a Palestinian city would be given responsibilities and rewards for achieving those responsibilities. Israel could deal with whoever the people would send forward (Arafat could not possibly be in more than one city at a time). If the city was purely a Palestinian settlement, then Jewish security would not have been an issue. All Israel would have to watch for would be weapon smuggling...think of it as Canton System applied to Palestine. However if I recall correctly, Israel was not keen on having a Palestinian state next door in any shape or form and wanted to negotiate with other Arab counties (most notably Jordan) about the fate of Pals.