Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (114395)	5/18/2005 12:34:42 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794149

Its a solid argument. It is one thing to say Saddam passed money, it is entirely different to say "I received the money" No, kumar, it is not solid, even it is passes muster as a "reasonable doubt" argument acquitting a criminal charge, it doesn't pass any kind of a smell test. When his close associate got the money, and piles of Iraqi documents and Iraqi officials all attest that Galloway was a bribee, plus there is his record of fawning support of Saddam since the early 1990s (he interviewed Saddam and asked how he managed to stay so "strong and resolute" for example), no reasonable person needs to doubt that Galloway did in fact receive the money, however he laundered it.