SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (104471)5/18/2005 11:46:24 AM
From: Cyprian  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 108807
 
newsweek is controlled by jews just like all the other major mainstream media outlets caught lying such as the ny times, cbs, la times, etc.

even many of the so-called 'conservatives' who complain about media bias are jews or have close ties to jews. bernie goldberg, dick morris, william kristol, charles krauthammer--practically the whole crew on fox are jewish or closely tied to the jews. even the lady who penned the article you just posted--michelle malkin--how do you think she propelled her career into the mainstream? she married a jew, jesse malkin. how do you think mort kondracke got a gig on fox news? married a jew. linda chavez, the (allegedly) 'conservative' hispanic lady? married a jew. how do you think all those ladies got their network jobs? connie chung, dianne sawyer, cokie roberts, paula zahn, etc? they're all married to jews! peter jennings has three kids by his jewish ex-wife.

wake up america, you are being fed your news by lying antichrist jews. if you want a job in the mainstream media you have to prove your loyalty to the jews by birth or by marriage or many years of servitude.

the only possible exception that comes to mind is pat buchanan. he doesn't kow tow to the jews, and it is only by God's grace that he has managed to maneuver his way on t.v. for so many years and bring a wee bit of balance to the lies and misinformation.



To: Bill who wrote (104471)5/18/2005 7:22:09 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Newsweek did a very revealing and insightful issue on what really happened during the presidential campaign. It was really fascinating reading, and came out right after the election. I think if you go back and reread it you'll discover that both campaingns--Kerry's and Bush's--had the same nondisclosure agreements with Newsweek. Unfortunately I gave my copy away.



To: Bill who wrote (104471)5/18/2005 7:39:22 PM
From: Grainne  Respond to of 108807
 
Here--a nice iceberg story to chill out with!

Iceberg takes bite
out of Antarctica

Collision forces maps to be redrawn

By Robert Roy Britt

Updated: 5:00 p.m. ET April 18, 2005An iceberg that collided with Antarctica has broken a piece of the continent off, forcing maps of the bottom of the world to be redrawn, European scientists said today.

The iceberg, named B-15A, is whopping 71 miles (115 kilometers) long. Scientists predicted an imminent collision back in January. Instead, the iceberg ran aground and stalled out. Then it broke free last month.

Now it has finally collided with the continent's Drygalski ice tongue and smacked a city sized chunk of it into the ocean.

The frigid carnage is visible in a new satellite image from the European Space Agency (ESA). The picture was taken April 15 and released today.

The Drygalski ice tongue sticks out into the McMurdo Sound on the Ross Sea and figures into maps of the region. The tongue is about 44 miles (70 kilometers) long. Or at least it was.

The broken-off piece is about 3 miles (5 kilometers) long.

B-15A is the largest chunk left of a bigger iceberg, known as B-15, that broke off the Ross Ice Shelf in March 2000. That initial frozen hunk was about the size of Jamaica. After B-15 broke apart, the chunk named B-15A drifted into McMurdo Sound, where it blocked ocean currents and caused other sea ice to build up, threatening wildlife.

More collisions between the iceberg and Drygalski are possible, the scientists said.

msnbc.msn.com