SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (104573)5/19/2005 5:14:42 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Yeah, the military had already investigated Abu Ghraib before the story came out, issued a report on it, which was ignored by the media till they had photos to publish.

Oddly enough, I had to go through this dubious process recently with another true believer, so the conventional reality report on that particular bizarre assertion is near at hand.

A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the Army’s prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not meant for public release, was completed in late February. Its conclusions about the institutional failures of the Army prison system were devastating. Specifically, Taguba found that between October and December of 2003 there were numerous instances of “sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses” at Abu Ghraib. This systematic and illegal abuse of detainees, Taguba reported, was perpetrated by soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company, and also by members of the American intelligence community. (The 372nd was attached to the 320th M.P. Battalion, which reported to Karpinski’s brigade headquarters.) Taguba’s report listed some of the wrongdoing: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact

The Taguba report was leaked, somewhat in the fashion of the current Newsweek Koran story it seems. To turn that around into another MSM smear is something that requires a measure of faith I can't quiet fathom, but I always had a problem with conservative "facts and logic" argumentation. In true W "let the truth be told" fashion, even after it leaked, it wasn't exactly made public.

The FAS Secrecy Project continued to push for greater openness where disclosure is legitimate. In early May when shocking images of U.S. personnel at Baghdad’s Abu Ghraib prison abusing Iraqi prisoners burst into public view, the Secrecy Project was among those pressing for full disclosure of the internal Army report on the matter. The March 2004 report is known as the “Taguba report” after its author, Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba.

The report soon leaked into the public domain (and can also be found on the FAS web site) even though it nominally remains classified. On May 6 the Secrecy Project filed a complaint with the government’s Information Security Oversight Office challenging the classification of the report.
fas.org

I could take issue with the other ridiculous things you said too, but life is short.