SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (47224)5/19/2005 1:16:41 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
LOL! Like I said, you simply can't get your facts straight.

Newsweak initially claimed they had "multiple" unnamed gov't
"sources" when they ran their horseshit story.

After it blew up in their faces they now say their lone
"source" couldn't even say where he had heard
the "flushing" story.



To: geode00 who wrote (47224)5/19/2005 1:17:10 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
“What the Democrats have become”

Posted by Greg Ransom
PrestoPundit

” .. the less you like to fly the American flag, the more likely it is you are Democrat. The more you think hard work and personal initiative aren’t the ticket to the good life, the more likely you are to be a Democrat. The more you believe the United Nations is a better steward of international relations, while America is a negative actor on the world stage, the more likely you are to be a Democrat .. ”
Etc.

gregransom.com

townhall.com



To: geode00 who wrote (47224)5/19/2005 1:47:40 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 173976
 
"An internationally respected magazine misjudges, and runs
with a report culled from one source who will not be named,
and then blames the administration for not, somehow, stopping
them from doing so. When the administration, understanding
that years of work may have been done irreparable damage,
dares to demand accountability, one commenter goes so far as
to say (paraphrase), “the government gave us the report, and
then blamed us
…”"

“With respect,” my ass!

The Anchoress
Filed under: The Fourth Estate, US Military

This is staggering disrespect from the press. Disrespect for the White House, its representatives and the military.

The press, finally, has gone too far. They’ve crossed a line and revealed - completely and fully revealed - their utter contempt for the military, and their hatred for the president. My journalist friend calls it simple “arrogance.”

No, it’s not “arrogance.” It is hate. It is juvenile. It is mindless. It is kneejerk and reactionary. It is bitter. It is adolescent. And yes, it is real, live hate.

And it is on display for all the world to see. It can no longer be denied or called something else.

Things cannot continue like this. Things are getting out of hand. If American journalists can not find some semblance of professional comportment within themselves, I fear for our nation. I fear that any hope of understanding or co-operation between the coastal elitists and the rest of the nation will be lost. I fear that relations between the two, already wary and distrustful, are going to spiral downward at an accelerated pace, and that cannot be good for our country.

Frankly the last thing the growing chasm between the middle-class red-staters and the press (and those they serve) need is an earthquake, and this press conference may come a sneaking tremblor.

Americans do not mind a spirited exchange between opponants, but they do expect The American President, whoever he may be, to be shown a certain amount of deference
. The Republicans overplayed their venom at President Clinton and America went into a protective mode for their president. The press, having seen this, should know it - they should expect it. Instead, blinded - utterly blinded, by their hate - they are going overboard, way overboard. And this is serious, because if the press goes overboard in it’s hate, if it cannot restrain itself, pull itself back from this abyss into which it seems ready to jump, it will take the nation with it.

America is going to have to decide, finally, if this snarling, sneering, deaf, accusative, snotty and ultimately unhinged pack is what they want in their most powerful journalists. And she is going to have to make herself heard about it.

The whole world is watching. The press are challenging the president and the military. Our enemies see this.

Our troops have died to keep us safe, to bring our enemies into a different mindset - one of democracy, one of openess. The president has stared down the whole world to liberate a people and help them grow into their fullest human potential, all of which can ONLY be to our nation’s good and future safety.

But there is a hate at work here, that does not understand, or does not care, about the repercussions of undermining this work, or of even completely tearing it apart.

An internationally respected magazine misjudges, and runs with a report culled from one source who will not be named, and then blames the administration for not, somehow, stopping them from doing so. When the administration, understanding that years of work may have been done irreparable damage, dares to demand accountability, one commenter goes so far as to say (paraphrase), “the government gave us the report, and then blamed us…”

(!)

Riots and murder break out because of the report, and even as people in the Middle East attest that these riots are because of this report, why, the press insists, the people were raging over something else.

No. This childish game-playing must stop.

The world is not perfect, and the folks on the left and the folks on the right are imperfect, also. And they often take great delight in wagging fingers at each other and repeating, ad nauseum, instances wherein the other side has fallen short. I admit to having - in the heat of anger - done it, myself. “Well, YOUR side did THIS,” “Well, YOUR GUY did THAT!”

I’ve done it. Many have done it. Perhaps most have done it, in varying measures. Probably we should not do it, and in a perfect, less divided world we might not.

But there is a huge difference between members of the public having a heated exchange that ends when they walk away from the keyboard to watch Seinfeld reruns, and members of the press acting like a pack of petulant college sophomores given way too much power.

When Elisabeth Bumiller, employed by the most powerful newspaper in the world, can stand in the White House, and address a representative of the President in the manner of a sulking teenager, “Are you asking them to write a story about how great the American military is; is that what you’re saying here,” and when another can sneer, “With respect, who made you the editor of Newsweek?” (which in any language translates into: “just who the hell do you think you are?”) then we have a serious problem, a problem so thrilling to our enemies, so clearly NOT in the best interest of the nation, that I would hope that even the most partisan among the left could take off the blinders and say, “wait…there IS a standard that our journalists must be held to, regardless of anything or anyone else!”

Certainly in a time of war, that standard might be understood thusly: Journalists are - at the very least - duty-bound not to present themselves in a manner that can only fill our enemies with glee.

If our friends on the left cannot admit to that, then things are very bad, indeed
.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the press, please. Try to control yourselves. Try to comport yourselves in a manner that suggests maturity, civility, professionalism and even - if you can bear to do it, and yes, it takes some maturity - a modicum of objectivity. For the sake of the nation, please, try. Osama bin Laden said that he felt free to attack the US because she had become a “weak horse.” We cannot afford to be seen as conquerable because we are so divided.

I am sorry to say this, Ladies and Gentlemen of the press, but you are now, officially, with this presser, doing the nation much more harm than good
. Many of you have decided you are “Journalists first and Americans second.” Okay. But if you do not believe it is your job to do the nation good, I would hope that you also do not believe it is your job to do the nation ill.

Make no mistake; this breathtaking disrespect does the nation ill.


theanchoressonline.com

msnbc.msn.com

opinionjournal.com

baltimoresun.com



To: geode00 who wrote (47224)5/19/2005 8:33:56 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Beyond Newsweek

By Dick Morris
FrontPageMagazine.com | May 19, 2005

The Newsweek magazine story falsely reporting desecration of the Koran by American military interrogators in Guantanamo, Cuba, where terror suspects are being held, is the fourth major false report printed or aired by a highly respected arm of the Anglo-American journalistic establishment in the past year.

Each of those inaccurate stories has roiled the political waters and threatened to inflict colossal damage on either President Bush or British Prime Minister Tony Blair and on American and British efforts to defeat terrorists and the regime of Saddam Hussein.

It is high time that the American people got the point: The organs of establishment journalism are slanted and biased toward the Left and disregard the standards of fair and accurate reporting, with impunity, when an election is on the line.

The list of false stories is telling:

• In the spring of 2004, the BBC reported that Blair had ordered his intelligence people to “sex up” reports of the Iraqi program to make weapons of mass destruction. For months, Blair was on the defensive because of the report, and the intelligence operative who was the alleged source of the story committed suicide.

It took a parliamentary commission to debunk the story and to force a BBC retraction. The ongoing damage to Blair’s credibility likely helped to account for his marginal showing in the most recent UK election.

• In September 2004, CBS News’ “60 Minutes” television program used forged and phony documents to try to besmirch Bush’s record in the Texas National Guard. It was only the careless error of the forger in printing the suffix “th” above the line that led to the truth.

• In the week before the election, The New York Times, the citadel of journalistic accuracy, ran a front-page story alleging that 370 tons of explosives had disappeared from an Iraqi storage site during the American occupation. The implication was that the carelessness of the Bush administration had put into the hands of the insurgent terrorists the very weapons now being used to kill our troops. But the Pentagon soon established that the weapons either had been removed early in the U.S. occupation or had never been there when our troops arrived. The Times story led John Kerry to change his TV ads and focus his endgame campaign on the allegation.

• And now Newsweek has published an inflammatory story that has led to massive anti-American demonstrations in Afghanistan — the first since the war — protesting the seeming defilement of sacred texts. Sixteen people are dead because Newsweek got the story wrong, and the image of the United States is damaged in the Islamic world. And Newsweek refuses to hold anyone to account for this outrageous error, least of all its own senior management.

Each of those “mistakes” was biased in favor of the left and was committed in the haste of liberal journalists to get some ammunition to discredit Bush and the Iraq war. But when the same reporter who wrote the current story filed the first disclosure of the Monica Lewinsky affair with his editors at Newsweek, the magazine piously refused to run the story.

In fact, in all the years of the Clinton presidency, I cannot recall a single instance of a similarly inaccurate high-profile story attacking the Democratic president.

... in part

frontpagemagazine.com