Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (114690)	5/19/2005 8:39:07 AM
From: MrLucky	Respond to of 794274

Never been a big fan of Hoagland. However, this is a decent article.

To: Lane3 who wrote (114690)	5/19/2005 9:28:52 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794274

sounds like bush and Cheney haven't done a thing right. Worst article i ever saw in print. What a dump. Let's take out Bush and Cheney and look at Iraq.. was it oil.. no writer doesn't believe it but says it will impact oil.. One of the reasons, was a very aggressive and dangerous leader of iraq that threaten world peace oil is impacted because of supply and demand nothing to do with iraq.. Pakistan he wants more pressure. I assume he wants the leader of pakistan removed from office and supporters of Taliban and Al Q. to return to office with nukes. What can the results be if more pressure ? Wouldn't it be great if writer has constructive ideas on how to get North Korea to stop the progress of nukes? rather he says we do not put enough pressure on south korea and china.