SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (233586)5/19/2005 9:48:56 AM
From: 10K a day  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571685
 
I like this so much i just want to read it over and over.

>>>Galloway vs. The US Senate: Transcript of Statement

<< “I told the world that Iraq, contrary to your claims did not have weapons of mass destruction. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to al-Qaeda. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to the atrocity on 9/11 2001. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that the Iraqi people would resist a British and American invasion of their country and that the fall of Baghdad would not be the beginning of the end, but merely the end of the beginning.

"Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong and 100,000 people paid with their lives; 1600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies; 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever on a pack of lies.

If the world had listened to Kofi Annan, whose dismissal you demanded, if the world had listened to President Chirac who you want to paint as some kind of corrupt traitor, if the world had listened to me and the anti-war movement in Britain, we would not be in the disaster that we are in today. Senator, this is the mother of all smokescreens. You are trying to divert attention from the crimes that you supported, from the theft of billions of dollars of Iraq's wealth.

"Have a look at the real Oil-for-Food scandal. Have a look at the 14 months you were in charge of Baghdad, the first 14 months when $8.8 billion of Iraq's wealth went missing on your watch. Have a look at Halliburton and other American corporations that stole not only Iraq's money, but the money of the American taxpayer.

"Have a look at the oil that you didn't even meter, that you were shipping out of the country and selling, the proceeds of which went who knows where? Have a look at the $800 million you gave to American military commanders to hand out around the country without even counting it or weighing it.

"Have a look at the real scandal breaking in the newspapers today, revealed in the earlier testimony in this committee. That the biggest sanctions busters were not me or Russian politicians or French politicians. The real sanctions busters were your own companies with the connivance of your own Government." >>

commondreams.org



To: TigerPaw who wrote (233586)5/19/2005 12:38:18 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571685
 
Who they are I do not know but this is not business as usual.

Today there was an article in the paper which indicated that internet VOIP phone connections would have to report to 911 the location of the caller (as land lines do). My immediate thought was that this would allow the government to track any internet connection back to it's physical location. It's scary that they cannot be trusted.


I take it you haven't heard about the new gov't ID that came to pass last week:

Real ID: A License to Kill

By Jonathan David Morris

Well, congratulations, America, you finally did it. You finally collapsed into absolute tyranny.

Last week, Congress defended freedom by sneaking the Real ID Act into an $82 billion military spending bill. The Real ID Act establishes a new set of federal standards for all state driver’s licenses, creating what some call a “de facto” national ID card. Ostensibly, this measure will aid Homeland Security in the war against terrorism. Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), who authored the act, notes that all but one of the September 11th hijackers “deliberately used valid driver’s licenses and state IDs,” because these documents allowed them to “avoid suspicion” at the airport. “Real ID would require all states to confirm… that visas are valid for foreign visitors,” Sensenbrenner says. It would also require that “a foreign visitor’s license term ends when the visa expires.”

Which is great. Unless, of course, a foreigner decides to kill Americans the first six months he’s here.

Everywhere you look, it seems immigration is in the news these days. As Neil Diamond put it, “They’re coming to America.” Last week, the Washington Times reported that U.S. Border Patrol agents had been ordered not to arrest illegal immigrants in the area of Arizona being monitored by the freelance Minuteman Project—the idea being that an increase in arrests would prove the Minutemen’s efficiency. Bill O’Reilly, for one, is incensed about all this. On his May 5, 2005, program, he told the story of a 42-year-old housewife, Mary Nagle, who was murdered by a 29-year-old Guatemalan with an expired visa, who was hired—thanks to a valid California driver’s license—to come to her home with a power washing company. “Now every sane American knows that most illegals are good people,” O’Reilly assured us. But: “At least 11 million people are living here illegally. And nobody knows how many of them are violent.”

“So Mary Nagle becomes yet another victim of illegal alien killers. She is no less a victim of our government’s failure to protect us than all of those who died on 9/11.”

Fear.

That’s what they’re selling here, people. Pure, unadulterated fear.

Those opposed to hassle-free, come-and-go-as-you-please immigration often complain that America has “porous borders.” These borders, we’re told, are the root cause of many of our problems. September 11th didn’t happen because we’ve meddled in the Middle East for decades; it happened because people from other countries are present in ours. And our economy isn’t hindered by frivolous lawsuits, regulation, and protectionism. God no. It’s hindered by damn dirty Indians answering phones for Dell tech support. And bastard Hispanics mowing lawns with a smile.

Be afraid! Be very afraid!

People are going to tell me I’m anti-American for writing this article. They’re going to say I’m “dangerously wrong.” Because, surely, any “sane American” would jump at the chance to seal those porous borders. Look, I understand why people don’t want other people coming here. Cities and suburbs are already crowded. Dream jobs are hard to come by. Income taxes are painful. And multilingualism is a hobby every blue blooded American is within his rights to despise. Gotcha. Fine. Neighborhoods retain the right to not want certain neighbors. I’m down with that.

But if you want to put America first, then listen: The Real ID Act is going to be a pain in your ass—not Mohammed Atta’s. If a guy wants to knock down a building, which is illegal, you think a legal document’s going to stop him? Why? And what are sealed borders, really, but an abstract excuse to force us to buy state-brand IDs?

About a month ago, my mother—a teacher—went to the DMV, which, in NJ, has already adopted a six-point ID verification system. She wanted to get a new driver’s license that day, but the DMV turned her away. It seems her old driver’s license bears the short version of her name, while her Social Security card bears the long version—an unacceptable discrepancy in this post-9/11 world. She showed them a pay stub to verify her identity, but somehow that wasn’t good enough. Sure, she’s a lifelong Jersey resident. And, sure, she happens to work for the government. But how do we know that’s not just her cover? How do we know the Board of Ed isn’t a front for a terrorist group?

This is just a preview of the fun stuff we have in store. The Real ID Act calls for licenses to be “machine-readable,” leaving the door wide open for traceable RFID chips. Like red light cameras, authorities could easily use this surveillance technology to fine law-abiding Americans for perfectly reasonable, yet suddenly illegal, activities—like buying a beer or having a wardrobe malfunction. You won’t be able to travel without one of these cards. You won’t be able to get a job. Hell, you won’t really be an American anymore. (Which is why we’re lucky Congress stripped out the Real ID provision suspending habeas corpus for non-citizens.)

History begs and pleads with us not to adopt national ID cards. The Bible warns of a time when the “mark of the beast” will decide who can and cannot do business (which, presumably, includes the things listed in the previous paragraph). The Nazis also serve as a fine example. They rallied a nation in fear of those no good, dirty, rotten Jewish money grubbers, then implemented their own national ID card system, with yellow, six-pointed cards. And now again, here in the land of the free and the home of the brave, we see this fear of the outsider—the stranger living and working amongst us—informing us to give up freedoms and privacy. Someone’s responsible for our problems. Surely it must be them!

Hey, if that’s what makes the Real ID Act easy to swallow for you, then, like I said, congratulations. To me, though, it seems like a pretty raw deal.

Jonathan David Morris is a political writer -- and sometimes satirist -- based in Pennsylvania. A strong believer in small government, JDM often takes aim at oppressive taxes, entitlements, and laws, writing about incompetence at the highest levels of culture and government. Catch his weekly ramblings at readjdm.com.

freeliberal.com