SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (47275)5/19/2005 3:15:46 PM
From: JeffA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Why did they retract it?



To: geode00 who wrote (47275)5/19/2005 4:27:18 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
You are the one who is wrong. There was only one source for the story anonymous, who now refuses to back up what he said.

As for Isikoff, he had placed the Lewinski story on hold and only released it AFTER Drudge had already broken the story.....he did not "hammer" Clinton...he did not need to.....the facts were lurid enough.....

J.



To: geode00 who wrote (47275)5/20/2005 12:17:45 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Betsy's Page

The Attack Machine reminds us of how Newsweek handled another
false story, their cover story on the fake Hitler Diaries
.

As the Attack Machine notes, this was the attitude of Newsweek's
editor after the diaries were exposed as fakes.


<<<

"Genuine or not, it almost doesn't matter in the end."
>>>

Sounds familiar, doesn't it?


betsyspage.blogspot.com

attackmachine.com