Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Barrett Bucket -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (50)	5/20/2005 3:40:16 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1233

Grainne's POV over that hunting incident still boggles my mind. Her defense of her clearly defenseless POV is all one needs to know about her reality defying opinions. I'm glad to hear all is well with you. I've missed your musings on SI of late. I got my cast off a week ago & have completed my first week back in rehab. I feel like a truck hit me, but I'm so glad to be moving forward.

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (50)	5/20/2005 3:41:50 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1233

Is that post a mini grub? :-)

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (50)	5/20/2005 9:50:30 AM
From: mph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1233

Reading the posts to which you were responding gave me a headache. That whole deer hunter episode/animal rights brouhaha boils down to this--Granny places animals on an equal footing with humans. She meant what she said about the shooting of the hunters. Most recently she put it in terms of being "relieved" those those (slain) hunters would shoot no more deer. IOW, Granny is basically against nature. There has always been survival of the fittest. I daresay she's a Darwinist, since she's also a professed atheist. How does she suppose we evolved? Beyond that, she affects animals and "nature" on a daily basis just by virtue of being alive and using modern conveniences. Who's she kidding?