Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (233979)	5/21/2005 9:43:44 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575174

What would you call it, an "un-sustained offensive"? Does that fit, I don't think so. A "sustained defensive", no way. An insurgency, or a series of guerilla attacks would be accurate. It isn't a single sustained action of any kind, and esp. not an offensive one. The only time sustained action occurs is when the insurgents are on the defense. Action that starts and stops, isn't sustained, action that is often on the defensive, isn't a "sustained offensive". And I will say unequivocally, without a bit of reservation, with 100% confidence, that... The Generals and grunts in Iraq will say that the enemy has a "sustained offensive". I'd say without a bit of reservation that they would say no such thing. I suspect your next response will be 5000 words trying to defend your semantic anal retentive stupidity... LOL I guess I should expect most of your response to try to cover for factual inaccuracies, or misuse of terms by attacking the other party of the conversation. This wasn't your posting pattern before Bush was elected, I don't know what caused the change. Are you that bitter about the Republicans being in power? Tim