Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kech who wrote (115189)	5/21/2005 2:29:22 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793914

They are producing embryos that are intended to be used for fertility. I don't buy that. They know full well up front that some "life" will be destroyed. It's still creating life to destroy life. In any case, the key for how these can be treated differently than embryos for research purposes is that they are the result of the intent to get pregnant. Yeah, go tell that to the poor embryo that is destroyed. It's still an unwanted, surplus "person." The same is true for those who accept abortion only in cases of rape. In both cases, the born people involved may feel better about it but ethically it's the same difference for the potential person.