Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (5058)	5/23/2005 12:12:31 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

Looks very cool....hope after all? alternet.org CC

To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (5058)	5/23/2005 12:27:38 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

House Rebuffs Push to Soften Offshore Drilling Ban # Environmentalists and industry officials alike see tougher battles ahead over moratorium. By Richard Simon, Times Staff Writer WASHINGTON — A bipartisan coalition of coastal-state lawmakers beat back an effort in the House on Thursday to weaken the decades-old ban on new oil and gas drilling offshore, but it is bracing for a potentially tougher battle ahead. The vote was 262 to 157 to defeat an effort to exempt new natural gas drilling from the federal moratorium, which covers most coastal waters except for large parts of the Gulf of Mexico. Opposition to easing the restrictions came from coastal-state delegations, including those from California, New York, Massachusetts and Florida. While environmentalists celebrated their victory, they said they were worried about other efforts in Congress to break through the federal moratorium on new offshore drilling. Bipartisan efforts are underway in the Senate, for example, to offer billions of dollars to entice financially hurting states to opt out of the moratorium. The bill's sponsors hope to include the measure in a sweeping overhaul of national energy policy now being drafted in the Senate. The push to ease the restrictions is being driven by a combination of economic and political factors: Lawmakers are under pressure to do something about high energy prices, and energy industry groups and their congressional allies have been emboldened by the Senate vote earlier this year, after years of debate, to open part of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to energy exploration. Richard A. Charter, a longtime drilling foe who is co-chairman of the National Outer Continental Shelf Coalition, an environmental advocacy group, called the House vote "only the beginning" of efforts in Congress to open coastal areas to drilling. "This is a good time not to take your favorite beach for granted, because it could disappear while you're there," he said. Mark Ferrulo, director of the Florida Public Interest Research Group, added, "This fight is far from over…. We're not going to sleep until this Congress goes home." Industry officials argue that lawmakers should reconsider the moratorium because of high energy prices and U.S. dependence on foreign oil. In addition, they point to new technology that they assert has reduced the environmental risk from drilling. "It's a new day in the energy business, and those who want to live in the past are only hurting the American consumer," said Jeff Eshelman of the Independent Petroleum Assn. of America, a trade group for independent oil and gas producers. Still, the bipartisan House vote Thursday underscored the political challenge facing the industry and its congressional allies. The congressional moratorium was put in place in 1982, and lawmakers have renewed it every year since then. In addition, much of the nation's coastal waters are off limits to new oil and gas leasing until 2012 under an executive order signed by President George H.W. Bush. His son, President George W. Bush, has said he will honor his father's moratorium. Offshore drilling has been a hot topic in California since the 1969 oil spill off Santa Barbara focused national attention on the issue, with dramatic images of oil-soaked birds unable to fly and miles of ocean and beach covered with thick sludge. There was another attempt Thursday in the House to circumvent the moratorium. An amendment was offered to a spending bill that would have lifted the moratorium on exploration in a now-restricted section of the eastern Gulf of Mexico if imports account for more than two-thirds of U.S. oil consumption. But that measure was struck down on a point of order and it never came before the House for action. Despite the House vote supporting the moratorium, pro-drilling forces hope to include in the Senate energy bill a measure that would offer states a share of oil and gas leasing revenues — potentially billions of dollars a year — as an inducement to open coastal waters. Such a measure could be more successful than the proposal defeated in the House on Thursday, because proponents portray it as letting states decide for themselves whether they want to be exempted from the moratorium. "Given that state budgets around the country right now are rather stretched, we would think there would be some states that would have an interest in exploring new revenue streams for their states," said Adam Sharp, a spokesman for Sen. Mary L. Landrieu (D-La.).