Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (61778)	5/23/2005 3:34:50 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

dipy. You said...."So much blather. I said ANWR oil is certainly not going to be set aside for the US consumer, but sold to the highest bidder in the international markets instead. And you are posting unrelated drivel in response."...... Actually here is what you said and you never said Alaska oil would not be set aside for USA use. You said there were no pipe lines and none would likely be built. I merely pointed out to you that you were wrong and the proof was all that unrelated drivel. And if you bothered to read some of the drivel ( facts ) you would understand you were wrong. And there is nothing wrong with being wrong but trying to cover it up with spin is wrong though. :-) If ANWR oil was meant for the US, it would require bigger and more pipelines to be built. That would never happen. Message 21343168 You must be nuts if you believe that Alaska's oil would be pipelined to the US. It will be sold in the international markets to the highest bidder. Message 21341834

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (61778)	5/23/2005 4:05:00 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

dipy here is a bit more drivel for you to ponder given your statements recently. It would appear that the Congress of the USA is also in disagreement with you. You said....."So much blather. I said ANWR oil is certainly not going to be set aside for the US consumer, but sold to the highest bidder in the international markets instead. And you are posting unrelated drivel in response."..... EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF NORTH SLOPE CRUDE OIL Section 410 of Pub. L. 93-153 provided that: ''The Congress declares that the crude oil on the North Slope of Alaska is an important part of the Nation's oil resources, and that the benefits of such crude oil should be equitably shared, directly or indirectly, by all regions of the country. The President shall use any authority he may have to insure an equitable allocation of available North Slope and other crude oil resources and petroleum products among all regions and all of the several States.'' washingtonwatchdog.org Meanwhile, Alaskan oil production is expected to decrease by 5% in 2004 and by 1% in 2005, continuing a steady decline since the state's peak output in 1988, at 2.017 million bbl/d. For the period January-August 2004, Alaska averaged production of about 902,000 bbl/d of oil, or about 16% of total U.S. crude oil production. Most of Alaska's oil output comes from the giant Prudhoe Bay Field, and is transported via the Alyeska pipeline. eia.doe.gov