Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (32202)	5/23/2005 1:49:17 PM
From: paret	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

eumenides is a Bush hating moron ? . . . I never would have guessed it. LOL

To: jlallen who wrote (32202)	5/23/2005 2:18:03 PM
From: AuBug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

There was no disagreement between scientific experts. Perhaps if you include the lying spin doctors from the west wing there was disagreement. The fact is that bush ignores scientific experts and the world's leading experts on uranium enrichment work in the US Department of Energy. bush fabricated a story to justify a war he decided to start before he even got the republican nomination or any national security briefing.

To: jlallen who wrote (32202)	5/23/2005 10:14:59 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

You ate up every BS lie that spewed forth from Powel's gap as he presented his case in the UN (in the days leading to the war). He presented all that garbage about WMDs, WMD delivering drones, Mobile Bio-Labs, WMDs carrying trucks (which were actually fuel tankers) etc., etc., so-on-and-so-forth. This compendium of nonsensical garbage/lies/ hypermisinterpretation was presented as SOLID evidence of Saddam being an immediate and severe threat to the security of the USA, when in fact he was less dangerous than Syria, Libya or Iran. This was the evidence also presented to Congress as a justification for the invasion (planned back in '02). But, true-believers/SAPs, like yourself bought it hook-line-and-sinker. Now you're either in denial or just don't give a damn about the truth so long as it tows the party line. Yes, there was disagreement, by the detractors who the Chimp Administration dismissed as Treasonous Anti-American Politicos. They so much as rounded some of them up and detained some of them without due-process - in a fine Stalinist tradition.