Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Investor Clouseau who wrote (10716)	5/23/2005 5:51:51 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 35834

What does Murrow's comment have to do with the current state of the unhinged liberal MSM today? ...."How did we ever win the cold war with SO many anti-American liberal media types around?" No doubt there was some luck involved. But it did take a President with some backbone & a majority of Americans who supported Reagan despite the best efforts of the liberal MSM & the liberal left. ...."Maybe the right wing media bashers are actually wrong about the 'liberal media'. Maybe the media is just good at reporting the truth." So you opine once again. And how do you conclude that the MSM is doing a good job of getting to the truth when they continually get caught lying, deceiving, distorting, intentionally misleading & they consistently report the liberal POV favorably & they make damn sure the conservative POV is presented as negatively as possible on most issues? This thread had documented hundreds of irrefutable examples of obvious liberal bias in the MSM. As I have pointed out to you based on the events of the last couple of weeks that anyone who clings to the misperception that there is no overt liberal bias in the MSM is either willfully ignorant, in deep denial or simply is not paying attention at all. I'll say it again. "None are so blind as those who will not see." And I'll point out for the last time that you are not welcome to make unsubstantiated opinions on this thread. And using the word "maybe" is just splitting hairs to make an unsubstantiated point - one that has no basis in fact or reality. So unless you can point us to clear evidence that supports your POV, please admit this assertion was merely your own personal opinion. ....."The evidence of a Republican majority in the House of Representatives, Republican majority in the Senate, and a Republican White House seems to support this fact." What "fact"? Is your baseless opinion suddenly fact? And how does the number of Republicans have to do with obvious, well documented media bias? No doubt you can point us to all manner of credible evidence to support this, right? Or is this just another of your baseless personal opinions? What say you?

To: Investor Clouseau who wrote (10716)	5/23/2005 8:13:17 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 35834

Democrats will soon learn that promoting ignorance is a losing strategy. Message 21352205

To: Investor Clouseau who wrote (10716)	5/23/2005 8:24:54 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 35834

Terry Moran, ABC’s White House reporter, in an interview with radio host and blogger Hugh Hewitt: “There is, I agree with you, a deep antimilitary bias in the media, one that begins from the premise that the military must be lying and that American projection of power around the world must be wrong.” Message 21352249