SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (18503)5/24/2005 2:37:55 AM
From: manalagi  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 361045
 
Hurray for Calvin College! Bush preaches mediocrity: " a C average does not preclude the presidency".
Now we have a President who openly admits that he is mediocre"!

nytimes.com


Preaching to the Choir? Not This Time
by Elisabeth Bumiller

WASHINGTON -- It's that time of year again when President Bush turns up around the country in sumptuous commencement robes, assures thousands of college graduates that a C average does not preclude the presidency and urges them to go forth and do good.

Calvin College, a small evangelical school in the strategic Republican stronghold of Grand Rapids, Mich., seemed a perfect stop on Saturday for the president's message. Or so thought Karl Rove, the White House political chief, who two months ago effectively bumped Calvin's scheduled commencement speaker when he asked that Mr. Bush be invited instead.

An Open Letter to the President of the United States of America, George W. Bush

On May 21, 2005, you will give the commencement address at Calvin College. We, the undersigned, respect your office, and we join the college in welcoming you to our campus. Like you, we recognize the importance of religious commitment in American political life.

We seek open and honest dialogue about the Christian faith and how it is best expressed in the political sphere. While recognizing God as sovereign over individuals and institutions alike, we understand that no single political position should be identified with God's will, and we are conscious that this applies to our own views as well as those of others. At the same time we see conflicts between our understanding of what Christians are called to do and many of the policies of your administration.

As Christians we are called to be peacemakers and to initiate war only as a last resort. We believe your administration has launched an unjust and unjustified war in Iraq.

As Christians we are called to lift up the hungry and impoverished. We believe your administration has taken actions that favor the wealthy of our society and burden the poor.

As Christians we are called to actions characterized by love, gentleness, and concern for the most vulnerable among us. We believe your administration has fostered intolerance and divisiveness and has often failed to listen to those with whom it disagrees.

As Christians we are called to be caretakers of God's good creation. We believe your environmental policies have harmed creation and have not promoted long-term stewardship of our natural environment.

Our passion for these matters arises out of the Christian faith that we share with you. We ask you, Mr. President, to re-examine your policies in light of our God-given duty to pursue justice with mercy, and we pray for wisdom for you and all world leaders.

--Concerned faculty, staff, and emeriti of Calvin College


But events at Calvin did not happen as smoothly as Mr. Rove might have liked. A number of students, faculty members and alumni objected so strongly to the president's visit that by last Friday nearly 800 of them had signed a letter of protest that appeared as a full-page advertisement in The Grand Rapids Press. The letter said, in part, "Your deeds, Mr. President - neglecting the needy to coddle the rich, desecrating the environment and misleading the country into war - do not exemplify the faith we live by."

The next day, Mr. Bush was greeted by another letter in The Press signed by some 100 of 300 faculty members that objected to "an unjust and unjustified war in Iraq" and policies "that favor the wealthy of our society and burden the poor."

At first glance, it seemed as if a mainstay of Mr. Bush's base, the Christian right, had risen up against him. At second glance, the reality was more complex. The protests at Calvin showed that Mr. Bush's evangelical base was not monolithic and underscored the small but growing voice of the Christian left.

That movement, loosely defined as no more than several million of some 50 million white evangelicals, opposes abortion and generally supports traditional marriage. But as a group it is against the Iraq war, the administration's tax cuts, Mr. Bush's environmental policies and, not least, the close identification of evangelicals with the current White House.

A leader of the Christian left is Jim Wallis, the editor and founder of the Christian political magazine Sojourners and the author of "God's Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn't Get It." Mr. Wallis, whose book has been on the New York Times best-seller list for the past 15 weeks, appeared at Calvin College on May 5 and is advising Democrats on how to appeal to religious voters.

"The monologue of the religious right is over," Mr. Wallis said in an interview before Mr. Bush's appearance. "There is a progressive, moderate evangelical constituency that is huge."

Others see the group as a far less powerful force, but they acknowledge that the Christian left cannot be a cheery development for Mr. Rove. "Were this movement to continue to grow, it could create some problems, probably not for President Bush but for future Republican candidates," said John C. Green, the director of the Ray Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron and an expert on the voting patterns of religious groups. In short, Mr. Green said, "Democrats have an opportunity to get some votes."

One question is whether Mr. Rove knew what he was getting into when he asked that Mr. Bush be invited to Calvin, a theologically conservative college in the tradition of the Christian Reformed Church that is politically more progressive than other evangelical colleges. (Faculty members estimate that about 20 percent of students opposed Mr. Bush in 2004.)

Mr. Rove secured the invitation through Representative Vernon J. Ehlers, the Republican who represents Grand Rapids and who attended Calvin.

"I think they understood the nature of Calvin," said Jon Brandt, Mr. Ehlers's press secretary, who also attended Calvin. "The White House isn't stupid."

That would be the view of Corwin Smidt, a political science professor at Calvin and the director of the Henry Institute for the Study of Christianity and Politics. Mr. Bush's visit, he said, was both "rewarding the faithful" who voted for him in 2004 and a strategic positioning for 2006.

That is when Dick DeVos, an heir to the Amway fortune and a member of a Michigan family that has been a major contributor to the Republican Party and Calvin College, may challenge Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm, a Democrat. Republicans will also try next year to unseat another Democrat, Senator Debbie Stabenow.

As for Mr. Bush, his commencement address on Saturday drew no protests in the Calvin field house other than from students who wore buttons that proclaimed "God is not a Democrat or a Republican."

One other small objection came from the bumped commencement speaker, Nicholas Wolterstorff, a Democrat, a former Calvin academic and a recently retired philosophy of religion professor at Yale. Dr. Wolterstorff said in an interview last week, "Here's a Yale professor being bumped by a Yale graduate with a very average college record." He said he planned to stay home and garden in Grand Rapids instead of attending the president's speech.

Dr. Smidt, a Republican, had a different view of the presidential visit. "I do think it's an honor for the college," he said. "Even if Bill Clinton had come at the height of Monica Lewinsky, I don't think I would have objected then, either."

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company



To: American Spirit who wrote (18503)5/24/2005 6:01:49 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 361045
 
Kitty Kelley not purring about critics

seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (18503)5/24/2005 8:01:52 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361045
 
IS GEORGE BUSH A LIAR?

bellaciao.org

By Peter Fredson

May 23, 2005

The American public has now had 4 years of what is loosely called “Bush Leadership.” According to most polls, about half of the nation thinks G.W.Bush is some kind of heroic or even saintly figure, and the other half thinks he is a shallow smirking strutting popinjay who is determined to destroy the democracy he found intact when he was given the Presidency by the Supreme Court.

Many people have charged that he has a firm propensity to misinform, deceive or even maliciously lie in order to gain some corporate goal advantage. Other people believe he talks to his God and therefore would not ever lie.

Perhaps asking some rhetorical questions might clarify the issue of whether Bush deliberately lies, makes simple but good-hearted mistakes, and is an innocent person who is deceived by bad people, or follows advice from his God.

Did Bush make war on Iraq in order to avenge an attempt on the life of his father?

Did Bush make war on Iraq because he showed that Iraq was involved in the 9/11 destruction of the Twin Towers and Pentagon?

Did Bush make war on Iraq because he showed that Saddam Hussein of Iraq was the mastermind behind the 9/11 disaster, or, at the very least, was an accomplice or patron of Osama bin Laden?

Did Bush make war on Iraq because he couldn’t catch Osama bin Laden, then decided to save face by regime changing in Iraq?

Did Bush decide to make war on Iraq long before the 9/1l disaster, as he was involved with the neoconservative plots to dominate the world?

Did Bush decide to make war on Iraq because his associates (V.P. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove, et al) talked him into it?

Did Bush decide to make war on Iraq because he knew that after the Gulf War the Iraqi army was sadly deficient, and that he could easily seize Iraqi oil wells to enrich his corporate partners?

Did Bush use emotional religious rhetoric, and the promise of supporting Christian domination, to persuade his True Believer supporters to give him carte blanche power, without any restraint?

Did any of the daily political rhetoric of Bush concerning Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, nuclear works, aluminum tubes, yellow cake, pilotless planes to attack the U.S., etc., prove to be true?

Did Bush declare war on Iraq to free the Iraqis from an oppressive regime or to seize their country as a future base for expansion of U.S. interests?

Did Bush use cruise missiles, helicopters, Bunker Buster Bombs, Shock and Awe tactics, 120,000 troops in humvees with deadly weapons as a legitimate means of spreading Democracy?

Did soldiers under Bush’s orders kill many thousands of Iraqis; destroy their homes and infrastructure because this is a democratic way to spread Liberty?

Did 1,700 American soldiers die for their country, or to satisfy a politician’s desire to rule the world?

Did Bush understand what Sovereignty means when he appointed all Iraqi leadership, stage managed the “elections”, called Iraqi resistance fighters “thugs” and “terrorists”, began building a huge permanent airbase and embassy in Iraq, and will keep thousands of American soldiers in Iraq for many years in order to further his plans to invade Syria, Iran, and other countries.

Did Bush understand that the world believes he is corrupt because he handed Iraqi resources to Millennium Corporation without a contract, without hesitation, and that by coincidence V.P. Cheney just happened to be the chief operating officer of Millennium?

Did Bush understand that the world believes he is corrupt because billions of dollars have disappeared without a trace into his military and industrial friend’s pockets?

Did Bush understand that George Galloway spoke the truth about Bush corruption and incompetence?

Did Bush ever find out who outed his C.I.A. agent?

Did Bush know he was following neocon design and THE “PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY” draft-dodging War Hawks in his cabinet?

Did Bush know he was turning Iraq over to greedy corporate neoconservatives?

Did Bush know or care that he was foisting his beliefs on the entire nation, that this is damnably intrusive and potentially a cause for civil and religious warfare?

Did Bush in any way enter into any question of abuse, torture, and detention of anyone he has detained beyond ordinary legal requirements?

Does Bush use fake journalists to praise him, highly select his audiences, have his bureaus write praises of his leadership, use Swift Boat people to demonize his opponent, and use phony phrases like MISSION ACCOMPLISHED so he can strut about as if he were a real soldier?

Did Bush know that turning his Oval Office into a Christian Chapel for Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson would turn into religious warfare with the possibility of civil war?

Please answer these rhetorical questions and decide if Bush lies and deceives often, or is open, honest and candid in all his dealings in the name and fame of the United States. Is this a government of the people, by the people and for the people, or a government of corporate executives, by corporate executives, for corporate executives and True Believers?