Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (683433)	5/24/2005 10:04:11 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Thats not what Kenny wrote dipshit. when British forces occupied Iraq against an insurgency, the ratio of foreign forces to Iraqis was 23 to 1. Today, it is about 174 to 1.

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (683433)	5/24/2005 10:08:59 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

What number is larger retard, 174/1 or 23/1? Cross multiply if you have to dipshit and you will see that 174 is a larger number and larger fraction. To get to 23/1, guess what, you have to subtract. Do you have any idea how many troops would be required for a ratio of 174 soldiers per each Iraqi? Lets say there are 80 million Iraqis. That would require 174 X 80 million Iraqis in troops.