Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (234578)	5/25/2005 6:48:22 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575637

Really, care to site the law? Be glad to... I'm still waiting. That cite neither answers the specific question (the law that makes lying to start a war illegal), or the previous more general question (ground for impeachment of Bush, Cheney and perhaps others). With the latest exposure of pre war memoranda, its clear Bush looked for any excuse to start the war and chose to present intelligence in a way that made his case. No that isn't clear. Even if it was that isn't the same as lying. If you believe something is true and you look for the intelligence that supports it and ignore the rest that doesn't amount to lying, even if your belief turns out to be incorrect. If you were not ruled by partisan politics, you would also recognize that Iraq is a disaster. I think your ruled by partisan politics, but the issue of Iraq being a disaster or not being a disaster isn't relevant to the ground for impeachment. If Iraq was as big of disaster for the US as the 3rd Punic war was for Carthage, that still wouldn't mean that Bush lied, or that if he did that a lie not under oath would be an impeachable offense. Tim