Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (234686)	5/25/2005 7:29:03 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 1576639

and better, Reid, who understood the deal to mean the nuclear option isn't an option, said Wednesday the Senate should put the filibuster dispute behind it and get back to work on other issues. "We should just move on," he said. "It's over with." Sen. John Warner, the Virginia Republican who helped negotiate the compromise, said all 14 senators involved understood that the nuclear option wasn't thrown out for good. "The constitutional option, which we call it, is not off the table and we all 14 understand that. It is very much on the table," Warner told FOX News. "To use an example, we simply unscrewed the fuse. But that fuse can be put back in." What deal?? It appears the dems here celebrated prematurely again. Or is that immaturely? lol

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (234686)	5/25/2005 7:44:21 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576639

re: Let's see just how much pull the "Bipartisan Dream Team" of 14 really have. If this does fall apart, the loser is the Republicans, big time. I was hoping, purely as a citizen and patriot, that the Senators would ultimately uphold the tradition of compromise. It's what has made this country great. I'm for bipartisan, you and the Republicans are against bipartisan. What do you think the voters think? John