To: CYBERKEN who wrote (10810 ) 6/1/2005 11:24:54 PM From: Sully- Respond to of 35834 Your temporary ban has been lifted CK. Please try to show some restraint in the future. Here's a little red meat for you that is over the top , yet exposes what the MSM is actually doing regardless of the their real agenda. IMO, they could have used insidious or treacherous rather than "traitor".Warning! R rated rant. And the Exempt Traitor Media Marches On Thread posted by Emperor Darth Misha The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Not that we're in the least bit surprised by this development : << New York Times: CIA Prisoner Transports Revealed >> Outraged, yes. Pissed off to the point where we're ready to prepare our next meal of barbecued Ewoks by ripping their heads off with our bare hands, then cook them in napalm, yes. But surprised? No. His Sithness has long known what people are only now beginning to realize: Our media are not only not on the side of the nation without which they'd be out of a job, they're actively against it. And why are they against it? Well, it'd be a stretch to suppose that they were in favor of Shari'ah law, since it would severely impact upon their ability to hang out in bars while scribbling reports for their next deadline. Even journalists aren't that stupid, even though they're very close. No, they're on the side of the enemy for the simplest reason of all, one that has been known for as long as there have been conflicts among men: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." And since those pompous media bastards are clearly the enemies of President Bush, they looked around to find some enemies of his that they could ally themselves with. They needed somebody that they could give aid and comfort to, since they have no place in their hearts for their nation when it is led by somebody they hate. They needed badly for something and somebody to make the President that they hate above all else, including cave-dwelling savages who'd just as soon saw their heads off with a rusty knife, as they've demonstrated time and time again, look bad. Problem is, the war is going swimmingly, the enemy is on the run and two nations have been freed from the rule of theocratic murderers. So what does an enterprising "journalist" do? Well, it's obvious, isn't it? He starts sabotaging the war effort in order to make something bad happen, in order to hamper the war effort so that he can fill up his precious front page and jerk off to fantasies of a Pulitzer. Never mind that this is a conflict fought for our very existence, never mind that the enemy's deliberate atrocities make even the worst blunders of ours look like Sunday School, never mind that the Exempt Media, through their pandering to our enemies and deliberate sabotage of everything that we do, endanger innocent lives. All of this doesn't matter to "journalists." They're on a mission, you see, and if they have to sink the ship they sail on in order to get the captain to give up the helm, then so be it. So let's all stop trying to come up with euphemisms for what they're doing, no matter how uncomfortable we are staring the naked truth in the eyes, because the naked truth isn't going to go away unless we make it go away. It's not going to back off unless we confront it and call it by its true name. And the naked truth is that the Exempt Media are traitors. We give you Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States of America: <<< Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort . >>> There IS no other way of describing what the Lamestream Media is doing. Let them hang for it.nicedoggie.net windsofchange.net nytimes.com ex=1275192000&en=6007accb4801296c&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rsshouse.gov