Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ild who wrote (33288)	5/26/2005 8:00:28 PM
From: ild	Respond to of 110194

Date: Thu May 26 2005 16:35 trotsky (@MRB) ID#248269: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved El Morro is actually quite well endowed as far as near surface copper/gold porphyries go. definitely the type of orebody that justifies development of a mine, and the fact that Noranda has resumed the drilling is a strong hint that development is being contemplated. of course this is also the type of mine that requires a large upfront capital investment - since it will be large scale mining. anway, the recent drill results can only be called excellent. naturally, the stock is down...but that probably has to do with growing impatience about the halted development of the Cerro San Pedro project, which has been impeded by some sort of local Mexican corruption stand-off ( as soon as it became obvious that a mine would be developed, someone discovered his long forgotten 'rights' to the property, probably bribed a few low level agrarian court judges, and presto, all work was stopped ) . but even without Cerro, MRB is attractive at current prices, considering that the balance sheet is strong, with about $45 m. in cash and negligible debt, and total shareholders equity evaluated at $88m. of course all of this would be moot if copper and gold prices were to fall, that's always the caveat...

To: ild who wrote (33288)	5/26/2005 8:00:38 PM
From: ild	Respond to of 110194

Institutional Advisors REAL MEN TRADE THE LONG BOND The U.S. Treasury intends to resume issuing long-dated treasuries. institutionaladvisors.com GRUB 33333

To: ild who wrote (33288)	5/26/2005 8:00:45 PM
From: ild	Respond to of 110194

MZM isn't growing research.stlouisfed.org

To: ild who wrote (33288)	5/26/2005 8:27:17 PM
From: ild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

China's Obligation By JOHN W. SNOW May 26, 2005; Page A12 When finance ministers and central bank governors meet at various fora such as the G7, the discussion regularly turns to the broad subject of global imbalances and what can be done about them. Our deliberations on the subject have led to a shared framework which begins with the recognition that addressing imbalances in the global economy is a shared responsibility among the world's major economies. We recognize that we all have a part to play in addressing the issue and in fact through the G7 have put in place a broad conceptual framework for addressing it. This framework recognizes that imbalances occur as the patterns of trade and investment flows shift between economic regions. They reflect uneven rates of growth in the major economies and are exacerbated by policies that restrict an efficient adjustment process. Economic policymakers must address these imbalances now; waiting only increases the risk that imbalances will occur abruptly and cause greater damage to the international financial system. Most observers agree that the international economy performs best when large economies embrace free trade, free flow of capital, and flexible currencies. Obstacles in any of these areas prevent smooth adjustments. At best, such obstacles result in less than maximum growth; at worst, they create distortions and increase risks. The U.S. is doing its part to address global imbalances by aggressively attacking our fiscal deficit and our long-term unfunded obligations. With the strong economic growth we have seen for the last several years, governmental receipts are up significantly and the fiscal deficit is coming down. We are committed to bringing the deficit down over the next few years to a level well below the historic average. Doing so requires continued economic growth and controls on government spending. We also recognize that we must increase household savings rates in the U.S. and have put in place policies to do so. Other major economies -- Europe and Japan -- must do their share to reduce imbalances. Large imbalances will continue if growth in our major trading partners continues to lag. These economies must implement necessary structural reforms to achieve higher growth rates -- to benefit their own citizens and to prevent the build-up of imbalances in the global economy. * * * Last week I sent to Congress a report outlining the currency practices of America's major trading partners. The report addresses the third and most immediately pressing element of the effort to address global imbalances: the imperative of exchange-rate flexibility, especially in large emerging Asian economies. My report did not cite China as a "currency manipulator," but it would be a mistake to interpret this as acquiescence with China's foreign exchange policies. In fact, we are actively engaged with several economies to promote the adoption of flexible, market-based exchange policies. Most notable among these is China. As China is now a larger participant in the global economy, its currency practices become a larger concern for its trading partners and for the international financial system. China's rigid currency regime is highly distortionary and poses risks to China's economy -- sowing the seeds for excess liquidity creation; asset price inflation; large speculative capital flows; and over-investment. It also limits the ability of China's neighbors to follow independent, anti-inflationary monetary policies because of competitiveness considerations relative to China. Sustained, non-inflationary growth in China is important for maintaining strong global growth and a more flexible and market-based renminbi exchange rate would help the Chinese achieve this goal. A more flexible system will also support economic stability, which we understand is of paramount concern to Chinese leadership. China's 10-year-long pegged currency regime may have contributed to stability in the past, but that is no longer the case today, as China has grown to be a more significant participant in global trade and financial flows. A more flexible system will allow for a more efficient allocation of resources and higher productivity. The current system is fueling over-investment and excessive reliance on export-led growth while underemphasizing domestic consumption. Moreover, much of the investment and capital flows into these favored sectors and projects may be going to businesses that do not best reflect China's competitive advantage, which ultimately could lead to another investment hard landing, more nonperforming loans and a weakened banking sector. A more flexible system would also quell speculative capital inflows that are costly to China's government and increasingly likely to prove disruptive. China's ability to sterilize capital inflows is increasingly limited and harmful to its banking sector. Finally, recent history has taught us that it's better to move from a fixed to a flexible currency system from a position of strength, and not when economic weakness compels reform. Chinese officials have publicly acknowledged the need to move to a more flexible system, they have repeatedly vowed to do so, and have undertaken the necessary and appropriate steps to prepare for such a move. Unfortunately, the debate on China's currency regime is clouded by a number of misconceptions of U.S. policy. First, we are not calling for an immediate full float with fully liberalized capital markets. This would be a mistake at this time -- China's banking sector is not prepared for such a move today. What we are calling for is an intermediate step that reflects underlying market conditions and allows for a smooth transition -- when appropriate -- to a full float. Second, we recognize that a more flexible system in China, in and of itself, will not solve global imbalances. As I have said, this is a shared responsibility. However, greater flexibility in China and other Asian economies is a necessary component and will contribute to that result. Third, some argue that a more flexible system will prove deflationary and increase Chinese unemployment. In fact, a flexible system will provide China with a more sophisticated array of policy tools -- namely an independent monetary policy -- that will prove much more effective in achieving price stability and the ability to adjust to shocks. Our engagement with China over the past two years, including fruitful accomplishments associated with Treasury's joint Technical Cooperation Program, leaves me with little doubt that China is now prepared to begin reform of the currency regime. In fact, I believe that the risks associated with delay far outweigh any concerns with immediate reform. The current system poses a risk to China's economy, its trading partners, and global economic growth. It is critical that we address the issues of imbalances aggressively and in a cooperative spirit with the goal of raising global growth. Nothing would do more damage to the prospects of increasing living standards throughout the world than efforts to inhibit the flow of trade. However, it is incumbent on China to address concerns before the mounting pressures worldwide to restrict trade harm the openness of the international trading system. Mr. Snow is the Treasury secretary.

To: ild who wrote (33288)	5/26/2005 8:27:24 PM
From: ild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

Equity funds report net cash inflows totaling $3.060 billion in the week ended 5/25/05, with Domestic funds reporting 76% of the inflows ($2.3 Bil) and Non-domestic funds reporting 24% of the inflows ($743 Mil); Excluding ETF activity, Equity funds report net cash inflows totaling $993 million in the week ended 5/25/05, with Domestic funds reporting 38% of the inflows ($375 Mil) and Non-domestic funds reporting 62% of the inflows ($618 Mil); Including ETF activity, International Equity funds report inflows totaling $621 million to all Emerging and Developed regions but Europe; Taxable Bond funds report net cash outflows of-$81 million as inflows to Investment Grade Corporate Bond funds ($280 Mil), Balanced funds ($213 Mil), and International & Global Debt funds ($133 Mil) are offset by outflows from Treasury funds (-$450 Mil), High Yield Corporate Bond funds (-$226 Mil) and Government Bond funds investing in Mortgage-backed securities (-$141 Mil); Treasury fund outflows are due to outflows from three ETF funds: -$432 Mil from the iShares Lehman 20+ Yr Treasury Bond fund; -$41 Mil from the iShares Lehman 1-3 Yr Treasury Bond fund; -$17 Mil from the iShares Lehman 7-10 Yr Treasury Bond fund; Money Market funds report net cash inflows of $8.988 billion; Municipal Bond funds report net cash inflows totaling $210 million as High Yield Municipal Bond funds report net inflows of $186 million.

To: ild who wrote (33288)	5/26/2005 8:27:35 PM
From: ild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

Date: Thu May 26 2005 15:37 trotsky (@sentiment) ID#248269: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved the gold sector data remain in 'neutral' territory...the recent rally hasn't gone far enough yet to resolve the picture one way or another. Date: Thu May 26 2005 15:35 trotsky (@oil stocks) ID#248269: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved on a quick sentiment data check i've noticed that the put/call OI structure in the oil sector stocks is at its most bearish reading of the past year. this suggests one should be very careful with this sector right now. most likely the correction that began in early March has further to go, price and time-wise.