Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (19085)	5/26/2005 5:14:04 PM
From: manalagi	Respond to of 361609

I voted for Kerry as well and sent money for his campaign. My vote was not because I agreed with Kerry who voted for the war, but because I wanted checks and balances restored for this country. Now all government branches are under one party. What's the difference between China under the control of one party and us? Even in Donald Duck was the decomratic candidate in 2004, I would have voted for him.

To: bentway who wrote (19085)	5/26/2005 5:18:34 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361609

After Bush had already invaded, they had a similar position. Before the invasion they had different positions. of course Bush was dishonest about his position before the invasion and dishonest with his WMD's evidence. After the invasion, Kerry would have stayed the course but gotten the UN and NATO involvced to help us win the peace. This was something Bush could not have done, having already snubbed the world community. Kerry would have obviously been much better for us in Iraq.