Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (163182)	5/26/2005 9:13:06 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Because that's the internationally accepted division, reiterated by Abbas today as he met with President Bush. The settlements outside the green line are illegal. I hope I live to see every one dismantled. That is not true. It's only "internationally accepted" by the Arabs. UN Resolution 242 speaks of "negotiated borders" (and does not, incidentally, mention "Palestine" at all), so that's the the real international standard - negotiations between the parties. So what is your principle for why the Arabs should get a total do-over on 1967? Are you really ready to prevent any peace settlement that doesn't hand the Old City of Jerusalem back to the Arabs (Jews removed, natch. It's never "ethnic cleansing" when Jews are removed) and redivide Jerusalem?