Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (163201)	5/26/2005 11:52:48 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

If it's "Palestinian land", why was it never Palestinian land when Jordan held it? or any time in the history of the region. The only time it became "Palestinian land" was in the UN partition of 1947 - which all the Arabs utterly rejected. Including the Palestinian Arabs. No history gives them all the land. No treaty gives them all the land. No promise gives them all the land. Sure, there are Palestinians on the land - but there are Israelis too, and they've been there for just as long or longer. So perhaps they should negotiate a border, particularly in the light of the war of conquest thing, which you seem to want to encourage to repeat again. Is that your official rule, when it's against Israel, everybody gets a do-over?