Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (35389)	5/27/2005 2:09:34 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

"When you equate telling an ethnic joke to acts of terrorism "... I did no such thing. You accused me of trying to pick a fight. I pointed out to you that if a fight has been picked, LnS is the picker. He has not just posted an ethnic joke, he has been bashing Muslims without humor for quite some time. I have tactfully called him on it in the past and in response he has called me names and bashed me personally. He has told me that if I think that makes him a biggot he doesn't care. I do think so. He doesn't care and you are defending him. I did compare his character with the character of similar people in the Middle East, a factual and truthful statement. You have a problem with that? "And if you want to respond to my well-intended criticism with another "and perhaps you too", implying I share what you consider to be ls's views on Islam, then soup al recently posted three letter that might apply." ...what you consider to be ls's views on Islam, ...what you consider to be ls's views on Islam, ...what you consider to be ls's views on Islam, lol I see you bending over to make your self his apologist. Seems to me like you picked a side in an arguement that has been going on for a while now. Feel free. What was your well-intentioned criticism by-the-way ... that when right wingers post extreme biggoted nonsense, we should over look it? Was that it? If not, what was it? I may have missed it.