Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (917)	5/27/2005 2:37:17 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Respond to of 42652

twfowler, you are preaching to the choir. <g> - Holly

To: TimF who wrote (917)	5/31/2005 12:21:33 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

This raises a queston I have been pondering for years. Why not stratified health insurance? If people want health care for $100 a month, give them a plan they can afford. Many expensive procedures will not be available to them. It is likely that some drugs will be unavailable to them. If someone is willing to pay $2000 per month, shouldn't they be able to buy a much better quality plan that would prioritize them in queue, and provided greater availability of treatments? ($100 and $2000 are arbitrary.)