To: tsigprofit who wrote (84 ) 5/29/2005 1:53:44 AM From: Lazarus_Long Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540831 I initially was pretty glad the 14 Senators last week reached a compromise. It's good to see people working together in a bipartisan fashion. But then, I thought about it, and I don't see this as much more than a way for the Repubs to blackmail the Dems into getting their extremist judges on the bench. Do this, or we go nuclear. Both sides were hypocritical in both supporting and condemning filibuster. Both had used it to forcibly get their way. Including Republicans. OTOH, why shouldn't a majority vote suffice for confirmation? You can pass almost everything with a majority.OK - so they reached a nice compromise, and now that's postponed. So What? They got their 3 judges, the most radical right of the 5. Again, they had majority support. Why shouldn't they be confirmed? There were all lower level judges. They don't get to rewrite the Constitution like the Supremes.And Frist says he can always invoke the "Constitutional Option" in the future - notice how they like to rename things to make them sound better - sounds better than nuclear. Gimme a break. Democrats don't do this on a daily basis? There's something illegal about it? Aw, come on.So - I see a group that likes to compromise when they get their way. Clinton tried this, with welfare reform, NAFTA, etc. - he was pretty much a moderate Republican himself on most issues Or so they love to claim.- he balanced the budget even, even got a surplus! Hard or impossible in wartime.See, and Dale I hope you read this too - I think you mean well. I wish things were as you wish. But this group we have now doesn't want compromise. They want a radical change in the way things are done in the US and the World - their way. Not, of course, that Dems don't want exactly the same result.I wish it weren't so - and we could see true compromise - but remember the Right got rid of the liberals in the Republican party. Remember there used to be some? And now they are targeting the moderates in their party too. Names?You can't always compromise. A compromise between Eisenhower and Hitler is impossible, or very, very ugly. It was made quite clear to Herr Hitler early on that compromise was out of the question. Unconditional surrender, remember?