SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (117100)5/30/2005 4:50:47 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
My N-550 says "It is punishable by US Law to copy print or photograph this certificate without lawful authority".

Common documents which establish both identity and employment eligibility are a U.S. Passport (current or expired), a Certificate of U.S. Citizenship (INS Form N-560 or N-561) or a Certificate of Naturalization (INS Form N-550 or N-570). In this case, one of the documents will suffice for both identity and employment eligibility.

The employer must examine the original document(s), not a photocopy, and certify that the document is valid. Most employers make a photocopy of the document(s) to attach to the I-9 Form. Forms should be kept in a separate I-9 file (rather than the personnel file) for INS audit purposes.



To: KLP who wrote (117100)5/30/2005 8:39:17 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
Why do we have this I-9 Federal Law if we are not going to heed it?

When Bush came up with his new immigration proposal last year my first reaction was to wonder what happened to the old one. This law was passed amid much controversy and never heard from again. The proponents have nothing to say regarding whether it worked or didn't work and why. Even the opponents have nothing to say about it. That seems very, very strange to me.