Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (117199)	5/30/2005 5:07:17 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793620

Yes, I DID say that. On another thread, about a different subject. If you want to depart from my subject here, about conservatives and liberals in general, and talk about this administration, and why you think it's unfair to characterize them as "reckless neo- conservatives"- I'd be happy to indulge you- but we must both agree to the logic of the exchange. I hope you realize that talking about the administration is not a generalization about all conservatives, which was my point here. Unless you think this administration symbolizes all conservatives- if that's your point, I'll have to disagree. I'm not interested in some kitchen sink type style of argumentation where we throw all sorts of extraneous information at each other, and pretend we are having a logical discussion. So, we can discuss: 1. The logic of calling all conservatives and all liberlas generalized names or 2. Embedded- the Tim Robbins production or 3. whether or not the administration is neo-conservative (a la the quote from the article on Embedded) or 4. whether the administration is reckless(a la the quote from the article on Embedded) but lets not mix the all these things up, ilkwise, and pretend we are making sense- ok?