Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (17353)	5/30/2005 11:14:32 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

No, you are the one misled. Your view does not have a factual basis at all. They want us to stay? The people in Iraq? Have you seen the polls? And in Afghanistan? We don't belong in either place, and have no business there. They are trying to have an American Empire. Not our place. >> I'm afraid you have been duped. There is an elected gov't in Iraq and it reflects the vast majority of the people there. They want us to stay until they are on their feet. So does the UN - in UNSC Res. 1546, what we are doing now in Iraq received int'l authorization.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (17353)	5/30/2005 11:16:29 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

The UN didn't authorize the US to go into Iraq, therefore it is Illegal sir. Those in our govt. that planned this should someday be prosecuted as war criminals for their crimes against humanity. Clinton would not have gone against the rest of the world, no. That was his advantage over Bush - he was not an ignorant, arrogant brute. >> Clinton did plan a war with Iraq and threatened war but didn't have the gumption to go through with it.