SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (117236)5/30/2005 6:46:48 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793624
 
Speaking of painting and the kitchen sink....No, I don't agree with your statement: I assume you would agree the administration is neo-conservative

Do you care to define "Administration"....

Exactly what people comprise this term "Administration..." All offices? the entire Cabinet? All the people in all the different US Government Departments? etc.

And then of course, we would have to define "neo-conservative..."

And since you agree with Robbins and his use of the term: "reckless", as in "reckless neo-conservative administration", perhaps you will share some of the reasons you believe that adjective would describe this "administration".....



To: epicure who wrote (117236)5/31/2005 7:38:36 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 793624
 
I assume you would agree the administration is neo-conservative

Not by the traditional meaning of the term, but some of the ideas are the same so its not completely wrong to call the administration "neo-conservative", even if it isn't completely right either.

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News